Home | Register | Login | Members  

Religion > Rosie O'Donnell
New Topic | Post Reply
<< | 1 | 2 | >>  
1. Sunday, September 17, 2006 12:00 PM
Kevin6002 Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 7/23/2006
 Posts:802

 View Profile
 Send PM
What do you think about what Rosie said about Christians? "Radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam in a country like America where we have separation of church and state." (ABC's "The View," 9/13/06)   Do you feel that radical Christians are as threatening as radical Islam?  What is a radical Christain?  What about radical homosexuals?  Are radical homosexuals as threatening as radical Islam?  What is your view?

 
2. Sunday, September 17, 2006 2:43 PM
RazorBlade RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 9/10/2006
 Posts:94

 View Profile
 Send PM

Given some of the posts I've seen here and from other life experiences, I agree with Jean-Yves Leloup that Christianity is a misunderstood religion. If only some of the people who claim to stick to the facts or to reason really did... Rosie O'Donnell acts as if fundementialist Christians flew airplanes into the twin towers. She isn't alone. How rational is that? Here is another example of reason failing to serve us. Or our failure to use reason in service to find the Truth.

 

The problem isn't religion fails to lead people to the "Truth". It is our failure to find the Truth for ourselves.  


We kissed Buffy. I may be love's bitch but I'm man enough to admit it.
 
3. Friday, September 22, 2006 11:05 AM
12rainbow RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:4953

 View Profile
 Send PM

I think rigid, literal interpretation of the Bible can be a dangerous thing.   I also agree that Chrisitianity is frequently unfairly attacked by the liberal left. 

I'm a bit confused by the term "radical homosexual."  Homosexuality isn't a revolutionary social or political movement, no matter what Valerie Solonas thought.  Radical anything can be dangerous, be it left, right, or religious, but you can't be radically gay.   Or is a radical homosexual one with strong political views, such as Rosie O'Donnell?  Is George W. then a radical heterosexual? 

In my life, I have personally felt more threatened by fundamentalist Christians.  Im not scared of terrorists, no matter what the government wants me to think.   It does directly affect me in my daily life when I feel separation of church and state is threatened, so in that regard. the bible thumpers are more threatening to my freedom than suicide bombers.   

 
4. Friday, September 22, 2006 3:57 PM
nuart RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

Yeah, well, what I meant to say was check out this website for a rundown on the past five months worth of Muslim religious violence in the world. Then I'd like Rosie to show me anything similar with Christian driven violence. (Not violence by those who are nominally Christians but those acting in the name of Christianity) Is this really even worthy of serious debate in the year 2006?

PS  Just a little photographic image of a few Islamic extremists gathering in a rally to celebrate their heady recent "victory" over Israel.  Pause for thought.  Something's happening here...

d

 


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
5. Friday, September 22, 2006 2:52 PM
12rainbow RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:4953

 View Profile
 Send PM
Of course R.O. was exaggerating, but when you're removed from from the violence, (especially Celebrities living in Celebrity Land) it comes down to what affects an individual directly.

 
6. Friday, September 22, 2006 10:18 PM
Kevin6002 RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 7/23/2006
 Posts:802

 View Profile
 Send PM
One example of a radical homosexual would be like an email a pastor friend of mine got.  And this isn't a pastor that protest againest homosexuals or anything like that.  This was the first time I ever heard him talk about it and he would not tell me who it was from, but  that people would know her in the Hollywood Industry.  Anyway, she said the point of producing the type of shows she producers on a major televison channel is to get them when they are young.  To get the youth interested in turning gay and she wanted the 13 year old boys and girls.  It was her words about turning the youth gay.  Now the pastor who got this email doesn't protest againest homosexuals but those protest againest porn which is what she felt threatened by.  I have heard of similar stories but you never hear about those stories on the news or in the media.

 
7. Saturday, September 23, 2006 12:26 AM
12rainbow RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:4953

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE: she said the point of producing the type of shows she producers on a major televison channel is to get them when they are young. To get the youth interested in turning gay

 

I'm sure it was more along the lines of 'to get the young to be more accepting of other choices by exposing them to homosexuality'   Seriously.  It's a very sad misconception that this translates into wanting to "turn" anyone gay.  And if it's wrong to expose children to homosexuality, then it's wrong to expose them to any kind of sexuality at all- which is ultimately impossible. 

One reason why gay teens grow up depressed and confused is because the Christian Right (and friends) sends these very oppressive messages that being gay means you're some kind of reject. 

 
8. Saturday, September 23, 2006 12:34 AM
12rainbow RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:4953

 View Profile
 Send PM
http://members.tripod.com/~aquarianzone/hetquiz.html
This is just a quiz that demonstrates how ridiculous and insidious homophobia is.     

 
9. Saturday, September 23, 2006 2:48 AM
x-ray RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:2611

 View Profile
 Send PM
Radical hetrosexuals are the real problem here. Especially the pious religious kind.


x-ray
if your back's against the wall, turn around and write on it...

 
10. Saturday, September 23, 2006 8:33 PM
Kevin6002 RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 7/23/2006
 Posts:802

 View Profile
 Send PM

No, that isn't what she meant at all.  What she meant is what I said.   But you never see gay people portrayed that way in movies or the Media.  Well, actually you did in 80's movies, LOL  But look at how you see Christains potrayed in the movies.  I am not saying that all gay people share this woman's view point.  I think that less than 1% do.  But also the point I am making is that not all Christians spend their time stoning people at funerals or blowing up clinics, but that is what the news would like for you to believe, unless something really bad happens then maybe you will you see a postive story about Christains.  I am not including the 700 club because I think it goes to the opposite extreme.

 

I mean think of a movie like Saved.  I know it is a black comedy and it is suppose to show what is wrong with a system, but think if Christains made a similar movie but pointing out streotypes about people.  You would never hear the end of it.  Or think of a movie like Broke Back Mountain.  What if the movie was about two Christian men and the harrassment they face because they are Christian.  Also the orginal ending of Saved.  The main girl in it.  I forget her name was suppose to go into the school and shoot everyone.  Kind of saying that Christians caused the school shootings.  But it is actually the opposite.  In most school shooting cases I have heard about the shooters had extreme hatred toward Christians and Jewish people.

 
11. Sunday, September 24, 2006 10:05 PM
Kevin6002 RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 7/23/2006
 Posts:802

 View Profile
 Send PM

Actually they are. 

 
12. Monday, September 25, 2006 3:25 AM
12rainbow RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:4953

 View Profile
 Send PM

I think it's fair to say that the world- culture in general- jumps to the defense of the gay cause because Christians have already had their centuries of intolerance in the sun. You really don't think that crazy Baptist lady got more media attention than all those priests who molested little boys, or John Wayne Gacy for that matter? Both are sick, but don't represent a dangerous ("less than 1%," as you say) radical group.

As for the Christian Brokeback style plot you mentioned, there's no market for a movie like that. It's absurd. A movie about oppressed Christians (perhaps Christians who had to battle the system for their right to hate gay people?) would be about as easy to empathize with as a movie about white CEOs who were really upset about affirmative action. Conversely, Malcolm X was a powerful film.


 
13. Monday, September 25, 2006 3:51 AM
12rainbow RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:4953

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

Actually they are.

And there's a reason it's called the Moral Majority. 

 
14. Monday, September 25, 2006 12:11 PM
nuart RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

(perhaps Christians who had to battle the system for their right to hate gay people?)

Yeah, they are a large and scary force in America today!  Kinda like that preacher with NO congregation but who was "popularized" by Daily Kos and Air America. You know, the guy who carries a sign reading "God Hates Fags." I daresay he'd have no attention at all from Christians if the Christianaphobes of the Left were not so obsessed with seeking out "conspicuous" examples of gay bashing church folk.

Absurd.


Susan


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
15. Monday, September 25, 2006 1:21 PM
12rainbow RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:4953

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

(perhaps Christians who had to battle the system for their right to hate gay people?)

Yeah, they are a large and scary force in America today! Kinda like that preacher with NO congregation but who was "popularized" by Daily Kos and Air America. You know, the guy who carries a sign reading "God Hates Fags." I daresay he'd have no attention at all from Christians if the Christianaphobes of the Left were not so obsessed with seeking out "conspicuous" examples of gay bashing church folk.

Absurd.


Susan


Which was exactly my point.  But they are scary to people like Ms. O'Donnell. 

Just to be clear, a dramatic movie about Christians who feel picked on still would only appeal to Christians who feel picked on.  

 
16. Monday, September 25, 2006 5:09 PM
one suave folk RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/21/2005
 Posts:5862

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:One example of a radical homosexual would be like an email a pastor friend of mine got.  And this isn't a pastor that protest againest homosexuals or anything like that.  This was the first time I ever heard him talk about it and he would not tell me who it was from, but  that people would know her in the Hollywood Industry.  Anyway, she said the point of producing the type of shows she producers on a major televison channel is to get them when they are young.  To get the youth interested in turning gay and she wanted the 13 year old boys and girls.  It was her words about turning the youth gay.  Now the pastor who got this email doesn't protest againest homosexuals but those protest againest porn which is what she felt threatened by.  I have heard of similar stories but you never hear about those stories on the news or in the media.
Hmmm, & why would this pastor protect this woman's identity, particularly with a message this outrageous? Sounds like an urban myth to me...
 

 
17. Monday, September 25, 2006 5:32 PM
12rainbow RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:4953

 View Profile
 Send PM
Right, OSF.  And if it was mentioned in the context of a sermon, and definitely if it was paraphrased, then the pastor was speaking out against homosexuals. 

 
18. Tuesday, September 26, 2006 12:57 AM
cybacaT RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 5/25/2006
 Posts:1216

 View Profile
 Send PM

I'm with rainbow - I got a parking ticket off a Seikh bloke the other day - and in my world that makes more impact that terrorist attacks overseas.

So Seikhs are just as bad as Fundamentalist Islamic Terrorists.

 
19. Wednesday, September 27, 2006 12:00 AM
Windom Evans RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:1954

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

I'm with rainbow - I got a parking ticket off a Seikh bloke the other day - and in my world that makes more impact that terrorist attacks overseas.

So Seikhs are just as bad as Fundamentalist Islamic Terrorists.


 What?

 
20. Saturday, September 30, 2006 4:32 AM
RazorBlade RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 9/10/2006
 Posts:94

 View Profile
 Send PM

Regarding a movie about oppressed Christians. In the West, a film about comtemporary Christians who are oppressed would appear absurd. However, there is more to the world than North America and Western Europe. In many parts of the Middle East, Africa and the Far East Christians live with a great deal of oppression. 1 story I read a few years ago, in the southern part of Egypt, local Muslim tribesmen kidnapped about 2,500 Christian women for slavery. When the local Coptic bishop complained to the judge with jurisdiction, he was arrested for trying to start a riot.

In the USSR, not too many years ago, the communists (aka athetists) murdered millions of Christians. And Jews and any other religious people they could find. Then there are all the sad examples of Christians oppressing each other. Such a film is possible if you put it in another part of our world.


We kissed Buffy. I may be love's bitch but I'm man enough to admit it.
 
21. Saturday, November 4, 2006 12:48 AM
Kevin6002 RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 7/23/2006
 Posts:802

 View Profile
 Send PM

Okay first off who said anything about the system being gay people.  And Christians hating them.  Making a statemate like that just proves that you have a phobia of Christians.  You think all Christians hate gay people.  Saying that only Christians would see a movie about Oppressed Christians is like saying only black people would like Roots or only Jewish people would like Schindler's List.  If it is the Moral Majority then why is that you can't pray in public schools?  Why can you have these huge Greek and Roman stautues in buildings and call it history but can't have the ten commandments in buildings.  Why can you be arrested by praying in certain places.  Do you think if it was the moral mojority that the murder rate would be what it is or that we would have as much porn as we do.  If you look at moves of God like during the days of Evan Roberts.  The murder rate and crime rate went down.  The prositution houses became houses of prayer.  People would leave work early to have time to go to the revival meetings.

 

You talked about Rosie being scared of some Christians well what if Christians are scared of some gay people. What is the difference?

 
22. Saturday, November 4, 2006 10:00 AM
nuart RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

I've always preferred Eric Roberts to his famous sister Julia though I understand he is the kiss of death to any film.  At a recent seminar on independent films, one producer claimed there are three things a distributor never wants to hear about a film project:

1.  Eric Roberts

2.  Eric Roberts

3.  Eric Roberts

I think that's so unfair.  They used to say the same thing about Mickey Rourke and I like him too.

Susan 


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
23. Saturday, November 4, 2006 8:31 PM
12rainbow RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:4953

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

Okay first off who said anything about the system being gay people. And Christians hating them. Making a statemate like that just proves that you have a phobia of Christians. You think all Christians hate gay people. Saying that only Christians would see a movie about Oppressed Christians is like saying only black people would like Roots or only Jewish people would like Schindler's List. If it is the Moral Majority then why is that you can't pray in public schools? Why can you have these huge Greek and Roman stautues in buildings and call it history but can't have the ten commandments in buildings. Why can you be arrested by praying in certain places. Do you think if it was the moral mojority that the murder rate would be what it is or that we would have as much porn as we do. If you look at moves of God like during the days of Evan Roberts. The murder rate and crime rate went down. The prositution houses became houses of prayer. People would leave work early to have time to go to the revival meetings.

 

You talked about Rosie being scared of some Christians well what if Christians are scared of some gay people. What is the difference?

 

I. I'm saying Christians (in the West) aren't an oppressed minority, so it wouldn't be a human interest story that elicits empathy.

II. The name "Moral Majority" was something they decided to call themselves. They exert an enormous influence on US culture. Look at the MPAA. (And watch This Movie Has Not Yet Been Rated) Look at the Republican Party (no offense, Republicans.) Thankfully, there's a balance between the Falwell followers and the godless heathens.

III. No one is worshiping Greek and Roman statues. Thanks to Christianity, those are dead religions. It's now considered fine art and history, as is DaVinci's The Last Supper. Moses' tablets are considered sacred and belong in the Vatican. The Commandments aren't quite cultural history yet- they're still a contemporary rule book that Christians follow and belong in churches. I think freedom of prayer is important, but so is freedom from prayer.

IV. Gays and Christians as groups- not individuals, as there are gay Christians- may always be to some extent scared of one another. A sad fact of the world is that people tend to be scared of people who aren't like them. But homosexuals don't hope to "save" heterosexuals from their straight lifestyles like Christians hope to do to atheists and other 'lost souls.' It's invasive and it's off putting. That's the difference.

 

 
24. Saturday, November 4, 2006 8:37 PM
nuart RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

This is a pretty interesting Wikipedia entry on the Ten Commandments.  I think the last seven are pretty universal among the religious and non-religious in civilized society. 

Susan 

Commandment Jewish Protestant Catholic / Lutheran / New Church
I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. 1 1 1
You shall have no other gods before Me. 2
You shall not make for yourself any graven image (idol)... 2
Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain... 3 3 2
Remember the Sabbath day, and keep it holy... 4 4 3
Honor your father and your mother... 5 5 4
You shall not murder. 6 6 5
You shall not commit adultery. 7 7 6
You shall not steal. 8 8 7
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor. 9 9 8
You shall not covet your neighbor's wife. 10 10 9
You shall not covet your neighbor's house... 10


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
25. Saturday, November 4, 2006 9:52 PM
Kevin6002 RE: Rosie O'Donnell


 Member Since
 7/23/2006
 Posts:802

 View Profile
 Send PM

 

1)  Christians in the West are oppressed in many ways. 

2) Again you are putting all christians in the same catagory.  Something you become upset about when Christians do it to other groups of people.

3) Who said anything about worshiping the ten commandments.  I agree somewhat on the prayer.  I think if Christians prayed more there would be no need for prayer in school etc... because society would change like it has done so in the past.

4) You say homosexuals and christians are groups.  Homosexuals say they were born that way.  Why can't christians use the same argument.  That they are born again that way.  Not just a belief system, but you become a new person.  And many homosexuals are trying to save christians from their christian lifestyle.

 

New Topic | Post Reply Page 1 of 2 :: << | 1 | 2 | >>
Religion > Rosie O'Donnell


Users viewing this Topic (1)
1 Guest


This page was generated in 312 ms.