I don't remember the Gazette passion of the Passion all that well, Gavin. Maybe I overlooked the thread. Never saw it myself but my interest has been perked by Apocalypto especially since Mel Gibson isn't in it. I have a teeny bit of expertise on ancient Mesoamerica and about 5-6 shelf feet of books dedicated to the topic, so I'd like to see how the subject matter is handled.
So far, I've read great reviews (Variety and Rolling Stone, I think) along with some sniggering negative LA Times articles. "Mel -- you're part of the problem; not the solution." "The New Gore." "Scholars Say Apocalypto Not Intirely Accurate." Stuff like that. I am expecting more as the days go by and as the BO continues to rise. When the LATimes gets a bee in their widdle bonnets, they keep up the attack as they did during the Arnold Schwartzeneggar first gubernatorial campaign. One LAT critic went bonkers over James Cameron and Titanic which devolved into a back-and-forth open letter writing campaign. Really funny!!!
Last night on Mad TV they did a hilarious version of Apocalypto with the subtitles talking about Jews and wars and yada yada.
The footage I have seen looks magnificent but I will not be adding any $$ to MG's coffers any time soon. Probably rent it when it makes its way to Netflix.
Oh goodie, something to look forward to! Tonight's Delight - Season 2 of Sleeper Cell on opposite the increasingly lame Desperate Housewives. I've made my choice.
Mel Gibson is a mess of a human being. I rather suspect when the time comes for his grudging Lifetime Achievement Award at the Oscars, more than a few old codgers will re-enact their indignant backs-to-the-honoree stance, just as they petulantly did with the great Elia Kazan.
Susan
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”
Ben Franklin