Home | Register | Login | Members  

Politics > Iran 2007
New Topic | Post Reply
<< | 1 | >>  
1. Tuesday, January 2, 2007 10:07 AM
nuart Iran 2007


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

Thought I'd start this thread and keep the title wide open. I'm not sure, but it seems to me there may be a post or two on the horizon with the subject of Iran.  I didn't have to search too far to find an apt article either. I took a pass on the one with Ahmadinejad's aide saying Hitler was a Jew and the founder of the modern state of Israel and opted for this one.

The plus side of having Ahmadinejad in power is just this type of rhetoric for which he has become known.  He continually reminds the US of his intentions.  The other plus is found near the end of the article with an increasingly beligerant and vocal group of Iranians who resent Ahmadinejad.  Will he last out the year? 

Susan 

Iran vows to 'humiliate' U.S.

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad scorned U.N Security Council sanctions imposed against Iran, telling a crowd Tuesday that Iran had humiliated the United States in the past and would do so again.

Speaking in the southwestern provincial capital of Ahvaz, Ahmadinejad said the Security Council's resolution last month was invalid and had left the world body's reputation in tatters.

The council voted unanimously to bar all countries from selling materials and technology to Iran that could contribute to its nuclear and missile programs. It also froze the assets of 10 Iranian companies and 12 individuals related to those programs.

"Let the world know that from the Iranian nation's point of view, this resolution has no validity," Ahmadinejad said.

He said the United States was the main power behind the resolution, and warned Washington: "I want you to know that the Iranian nation has humiliated you many times, and it will humiliate you in future."

The U.S. has led the drive to stop Iran from enriching uranium -- a process that produces the material for either nuclear reactors or bombs. Iran denies that it seeks to build atomic weapons, saying its nuclear program is limited to the generation of electricity.

Ahmadinejad said the sanctions were not important but were part of a campaign of psychological warfare against Iran that was designed to provoke dissent within the country.

Recalling the West's support for Iraq, then ruled by Saddam Hussein, during its eight-year war with Iran in the 1980s, he said: "If all the powers that supported Saddam in his war against Iran were to regroup and confront Iran again, Iranians would deliver a historic slap in their face."

Ahmadinejad said Iran had done everything it could to prove that its nuclear program is peaceful, but the West -- in the name of opposing nuclear weapons -- was trying to thwart Iran's development.

"We have tried all legal, wise and logical ways to convince these corrupt and selfish powers," he said.

While Ahmadinejad has repeatedly attacked the Security Council resolution, he has avoided any public comment on the results of Dec. 15 municipal elections, in which his political allies were heavily defeated.

The polls were seen as an electoral test of Ahmadinejad's presidency, and the success of his opponents suggested that voters want him to pay more attention to domestic issues rather than foreign policy.

Some people in the crowd in Ahvaz on Tuesday tried to remind the president of the need to address domestic problems. State television showed a placard carried by one spectator that read: "Inflation, unemployment, insecurity, drug addiction have desiccated the tree of the revolution."

Inflation is officially at 12 percent but thought to be much higher, and an estimated 3 million people are unemployed.

 


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
2. Friday, January 5, 2007 11:50 AM
nuart RE: Iran 2007


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

Could it be??? You know how it goes with totalitarian leaders -- you never really know the state of their health as evidenced by Yassir Arafat's nasty cold or Fidel Castro's complete recovery from non-cancer surgery. You also never know when they're dead and gone unless they are an ex-dictator who has been dropped from the gallows.

So now the rumor is that Ayatollah Khamenei is dead. Here's one article but I am sure there will be more on this later. Then again, it could be as to the moment as the imminent release of kidnapped Israeli soldier, Gilat Shalit, whose release has been on and off again since late last summer.

Susan

Online rumors: Iran's supreme leader dead

Following report of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's death in American expert's blog, numerous rumors on internet claim he passed away. Iranian media conveys business as usual, while question remains: Is he dead or alive?
Dudi Cohen

In the past 24 hours, it has been rumored that Iran 's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei passed away. Iranian news agencies did not address the issue, but numerous blogs reported it. The blogs have yet to be confirmed by any official source. It all started with a blog by Michael Ledeen, a senior researcher at the US Institute for Public Policy in Washington, who reported the ayatollah's death.

Supreme Leader's Ruling

Khamenei: Beware of watching non-Muslim women / Yaakov Lappin

In new web ruling, Iran's supreme leader warns of 'vile consequences' of looking at non-Muslim women
Full story

Ledeen, a neoconservative, added no other details than the death itself, but because of his reputation, a cascade of rumors began spreading between blogs worldwide, all of them asking to know: Is it true or not? Is he dead or alive?

In the blog , written on the 'Pajamas Media' website, Ledeen reported that a source has "learned that Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has apparently succumbed to the cancer that hospitalized him last month" at the age of 67. A blogger of Iranian origin estimated that "something is happening, and I hope it is not the collapse of another dictator, becayse Iran should prepare for someone worse."

Another blogger, living outside Iran, wrote: "My mother in Tehran says that there are songs on television, so everything is as usual."

He added that before the death of Ayatollah Khomeini, the former leader, the regime called on the public to pray for his wellbeing and prepared for the leader's death. But this time, there is no sign on the media in Iran testifying to an unusual event.

'An Israeli conspiracy'

Practically all media outlets in Iran are closely supervised by the regime and have yet to deny the report. The only website which responded to the rumors was Baztab, which is owned by Mohsen Razaee, the secretary of the Expediency Discernment Council of Iran, and which claimed that the report was "an Israeli conspiracy."

And what about Ahmadinejad? The energetic Iranian president continued his trip to the south of the country and did not convey any sign to testify that such a highly significant event has indeed taken place.

The last time 67-year-old Khamenei was seen in public was on December 15, when he arrived to vote in the elections for the Council of Experts and the local councils in Iran. Surprisingly, however, he did not appear in public in order to deliver his sermon in honor of the Hajj, as he does every year. Instead, his office issued a written announcement on his behalf.

If the Iranian supreme leader is indeed dead, the Council of Experts, a body comprised of 86 clerics, will elect one of its members as the new leader. Under such circumstances, internal struggles may erupt between the clerics in Iran, and this may undermine the Iranian regime.

But UPI says...

Iran: Reports supreme leader dead false

UNITED NATIONS, Jan. 5 (UPI) -- Iran's ambassador to the United Nations says there is no truth to reports his nation's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini-Khamenei, has died.

Reports had surfaced on the internet Friday the 67 year-old Khamenei died. There were reports last month he was seriously ill.

But, Javad Zarif, Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, told United Press International, "There is no truth to that" when asked about the reports.

Khamenei has been Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran since 1989.

The former Persia became a republic in 1979 when conservative clerical forces established a theocratic system of government. The unltimate political authority was put in the hands of a senior religious scholar, in this case, Khamenei.

Are we convinced by Zarif's denials???



     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
3. Friday, January 5, 2007 11:59 AM
nuart RE: Iran 2007


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

This is a good place to keep track of the Ayatollah death watch.

Who knows what it all means.  The death of a fairly young Ayatollah necessarily means their will be a power struggle within  the mullahcracy.  Who knows how that will impact the prominent high profile enjoyed by Ahmadinejad under this Ayatollah?

Susan 


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
4. Saturday, January 6, 2007 8:41 PM
nuart RE: Iran 2007


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

So I was just driving my sister-in-law and brother-in-law back to their home after picking them up at the airport. On the way home, I heard some talk on the radio about Israel planning a hit on nuclear facilities in Iran. Google News and I see this is from the UK Times website. 

A bluff?  Something intentionally leaked to add a little punch to the UN sanctions. 

Sooner or later, I will cajole others into commenting about Iran 2007, where momentous events could be on the horizon.

Susan





The Sunday Times January 07, 2007

Revealed: Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran




ISRAEL has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons.

Two Israeli air force squadrons are training to blow up an Iranian facility using low-yield nuclear “bunker-busters”, according to several Israeli military sources.

The attack would be the first with nuclear weapons since 1945, when the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Israeli weapons would each have a force equivalent to one-fifteenth of the Hiroshima bomb.

Under the plans, conventional laser-guided bombs would open “tunnels” into the targets. “Mini-nukes” would then immediately be fired into a plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce the risk of radioactive fallout.

“As soon as the green light is given, it will be one mission, one strike and the Iranian nuclear project will be demolished,” said one of the sources.

The plans, disclosed to The Sunday Times last week, have been prompted in part by the Israeli intelligence service Mossad’s assessment that Iran is on the verge of producing enough enriched uranium to make nuclear weapons within two years.

Israeli military commanders believe conventional strikes may no longer be enough to annihilate increasingly well-defended enrichment facilities. Several have been built beneath at least 70ft of concrete and rock. However, the nuclear-tipped bunker-busters would be used only if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United States declined to intervene, senior sources said.

Israeli and American officials have met several times to consider military action. Military analysts said the disclosure of the plans could be intended to put pressure on Tehran to halt enrichment, cajole America into action or soften up world opinion in advance of an Israeli attack.

Some analysts warned that Iranian retaliation for such a strike could range from disruption of oil supplies to the West to terrorist attacks against Jewish targets around the world.

Israel has identified three prime targets south of Tehran which are believed to be involved in Iran’s nuclear programme:

  • Natanz, where thousands of centrifuges are being installed for uranium enrichment
  • A uranium conversion facility near Isfahan where, according to a statement by an Iranian vice-president last week, 250 tons of gas for the enrichment process have been stored in tunnels
  • A heavy water reactor at Arak, which may in future produce enough plutonium for a bomb

    Israeli officials believe that destroying all three sites would delay Iran’s nuclear programme indefinitely and prevent them from having to live in fear of a “second Holocaust”.

    The Israeli government has warned repeatedly that it will never allow nuclear weapons to be made in Iran, whose president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has declared that “Israel must be wiped off the map”.

    Robert Gates, the new US defence secretary, has described military action against Iran as a “last resort”, leading Israeli officials to conclude that it will be left to them to strike.

    Israeli pilots have flown to Gibraltar in recent weeks to train for the 2,000-mile round trip to the Iranian targets. Three possible routes have been mapped out, including one over Turkey.

    Air force squadrons based at Hatzerim in the Negev desert and Tel Nof, south of Tel Aviv, have trained to use Israel’s tactical nuclear weapons on the mission. The preparations have been overseen by Major General Eliezer Shkedi, commander of the Israeli air force.

    Sources close to the Pentagon said the United States was highly unlikely to give approval for tactical nuclear weapons to be used. One source said Israel would have to seek approval “after the event”, as it did when it crippled Iraq’s nuclear reactor at Osirak with airstrikes in 1981.

    Scientists have calculated that although contamination from the bunker-busters could be limited, tons of radioactive uranium compounds would be released.

    The Israelis believe that Iran’s retaliation would be constrained by fear of a second strike if it were to launch its Shehab-3 ballistic missiles at Israel.

    However, American experts warned of repercussions, including widespread protests that could destabilise parts of the Islamic world friendly to the West.

    Colonel Sam Gardiner, a Pentagon adviser, said Iran could try to close the Strait of Hormuz, the route for 20% of the world’s oil.

    Some sources in Washington said they doubted if Israel would have the nerve to attack Iran. However, Dr Ephraim Sneh, the deputy Israeli defence minister, said last month: “The time is approaching when Israel and the international community will have to decide whether to take military action against Iran.”


  •      
    “Half a truth is often a great lie.”

     

    Ben Franklin

     
    5. Saturday, January 6, 2007 10:43 PM
    Raymond RE: Iran 2007


     Member Since
     12/18/2005
     Posts:1664

     View Profile
     Send PM

    Just an article that goes with this thread :

     Iran reformists slam government's nuclear policy  01/06/07

    By Alireza Ronaghi

    TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iranian reformist parliamentarians on Saturday blamed President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's government for failing to prevent United Nations sanctions.

    The U.N. Security Council voted unanimously on December 23 to impose sanctions on Iran's trade in sensitive nuclear materials and technology in an attempt to stop uranium enrichment work that could produce material that could be used in bombs.

    Iran says it wants nuclear power to generate electricity.

    Reformist former President Mohammad Khatami suspended Iran's nuclear work for more than two years in an effort to build confidence and avoid confrontation with the West, but resumed uranium enrichment in February last year.

    "The only way to pass the crisis is to build confidence ... but a holding Holocaust conference and financing the Hamas government creates mistrust and tension," Noureddin Pirmoazzen, the spokesman of parliament's reformist faction, told Reuters.

    Ahmadinejad's government hosted a conference in Tehran in December, where participants questioned the Holocaust. It also granted $250 million in aid to the Palestinian Hamas government after Western donors withheld funds.

    After two election landslides that brought Khatami to office in 1997 and 2001, Iran's reformers suffered a series on poll setbacks with voters disillusioned at their inability to carry out their policies due to conservative opposition.  

    The culmination of the reformers' defeats came in 2005 when voters elected the hardline Ahmadinejad who promised to use Iran's large oil revenues to help the poor.

    But the reformers made a strong showing at local council elections in December, with many voters worried about Iran's increasing diplomatic isolation and economic problems.

    IMPEACHMENT?

    Pirmoazzen said that two U.N. resolutions against Iran in the first 18 months of the government's term in office showed the foreign ministry was incapable of looking after Iran's national interests.

    "We hope to witness a return to the manner of Khatami's government and see the crisis is solved in the next 60 days, or else we will have no alternative but to impeach Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki," Pirmoazzen said.

    Any request to impeach a minister needs to be signed by at least 10 lawmakers. Pirmoazzen said that even without the support of majority conservative deputies, the 42-member reformist faction had enough votes to call an impeachment debate. But the impeachment motion would be unlikely to succeed.

    In a separate bid, reformist lawmakers also want Ahmadinejad to come to parliament to answer questions on his government's domestic and foreign policies. But there was little chance of the motion succeeding as it would need 72 lawmakers to sign it.

    "Although some 150 lawmakers may have questions from Ahmadinejad, it does not mean that the same number of signatures can be collected to support the plan," Akbar Alami, the lawmaker who has launched the plan, told Reuters.

    Alami declined to elaborate on what the questions he would like to ask the president, but said they included matters of foreign policy.

    "We have tried to bring up those questions in several ways but have received no convincing answers yet," Alami said, "We are waiting for appropriate timely conditions to bring up the questions," he said.

    Ahmadinejad has called the Security Council's resolution a "piece of scrap paper" and has vowed to press ahead with Iran's peaceful nuclear program, which the West fears may be a covert plan to make atomic weapons.

     
    6. Sunday, January 7, 2007 11:16 AM
    nuart RE: Iran 2007


     Member Since
     12/18/2005
     Posts:7632

     View Profile
     Send PM

    From the Jerusalem Post, these comments from Iran and from Israeli officials. The large red print near the bottom makes the most sense to me.

    There's an old saying from Israel that goes something like this: Israel will not be the first nation in the region to use nuclear weapons. But Israel will not be the second...

    ...which has the type of ambiguity expressed in most of the official Israeli comments below.

    Susan

    The Jerusalem Post Internet Edition

    Tehran: Israel will regret any attack



    In response to a report on Sunday that Israel planned to attack Teheran's nuclear sites, Iran declared that any attack would provoke a reaction and that "anyone who attacks will regret their actions very quickly."

    According to Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Muhammad Ali Husseini, the report published in the London-based Sunday Times proved that Israel was in possession of nuclear weapons.

    "This step even comes after the Israeli prime minister's admission, which revealed the fact that the Israeli regime has nuclear weapons in its possession," Husseini said, referring to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's slip-of-the-tongue last month, when he hinted on German television that Israel was among the world's nuclear-equipped nations.

    "Now this will convince the international community that the main threat to the world, and to our region in particular, is the Zionist regime," Husseini added.

    The Prime Minister's Office, however, said it would not respond to the Times claim. "We don't respond to publications in the Sunday Times," said Miri Eisin, Olmert's spokeswoman.

    Minister of Strategic Affairs Avigdor Lieberman also declined to comment on the report, which claimed that Israel had drawn up plans to destroy Iran's uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons.

    But Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev denied the report and said, "The focus of the Israeli activity today is to give full support to diplomatic actions and the expeditious and full implementation of Security Council resolution 1737. If diplomacy succeeds, the problem can be solved peaceably."

    Earlier, Meretz MK Zehava Gal-On urged Olmert to refute the report.

    "It is impossible that Israel would plan to get caught up in another adventure after [our] experience in Lebanon, and act as the world's sheriff," Israel Radio quoted Gal-On as saying. She added that diplomacy was the only way to solve the problem.

    According to the Times report, military sources had reportedly disclosed to the British newspaper details of two IAF squadrons that have been training to blow up an enrichment plant in Natanz using low-yield nuclear "bunker busters."

    Jerusalem officials refused to comment on the report later Sunday morning, Army Radio said.

    A heavy water plant at Arak and a uranium conversion plant at Isfahan would also be targeted, using conventional bombs, according to the Times.

    Reportedly, the plan envisaged conventional laser-guided bombs opening "tunnels" into the targets. Nuclear warheads would then be fired into the plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce radioactive fallout.

    IAF pilots have flown to Gibraltar in recent weeks to train for the 2,000 mile round-trip to the Iranian targets, the Times said, adding that three possible routes to Iran had been mapped out, including one over Turkey.

    The Times suggested that Israel may be trying to scare Iran or to cajole the US into taking stronger action against Teheran's nuclear program.

    However, the report went on to speculate that Israel may strike at Iran's nuclear facilities and pressure the Americans to agree with the move after the event.

    Israeli analysts denounced the report on Sunday as entirely false.

    "I refuse to believe that anyone here would consider using nuclear weapons against Iran," Reuven Pedatzur, a prominent defense analyst, told the AP in Israel on Sunday. "It is possible that this was a leak done on purpose, as deterrence, to say: 'Someone better hold us back, before we do something crazy.'"

    Ephraim Kam, a strategic expert at Tel Aviv University's Institute for National Strategic Studies and formerly a senior army intelligence officer also dismissed the report.

    "No reliable source would ever speak about this, certainly not to the Sunday Times," Kam said.

    In March 2005, the Sunday Times reported that Israel had drawn up secret plans for a combined air and ground attack on targets in Iran if diplomacy failed to halt the Iranian nuclear program.

    The newspaper then claimed that the inner cabinet of former prime minister Ariel Sharon had given "initial authorization" for an attack at a private meeting on his ranch in the Negev.
     


         
    “Half a truth is often a great lie.”

     

    Ben Franklin

     
    7. Sunday, January 7, 2007 11:21 AM
    nuart RE: Iran 2007


     Member Since
     12/18/2005
     Posts:7632

     View Profile
     Send PM

    Oh, and this from Iran via the AP.  It appears (officially per Iran) that the Ayatollah is alive; long live the Ayatollah. In good health even!  I am not convinced. 

    Susan 

    Jan 7, 4:35 AM EST

    Official: Khamenei Enjoys Good Health

     

    TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Iran's foreign ministry on Sunday denied rumors that supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had died, saying he was in good health.

    "He is in completely good health," said Mohammed Ali Hosseini, ministry spokesman, in his weekly media briefing when he was asked about Khamenei. "Some media made speculations that were not true. We wish him a long life and (lasting) good health."

    Earlier this week, rumors appeared on the Internet claiming Khamenei was dead.

    Khamenei, 67, has final say on all state matters in Iran as supreme leader, a post he has held since 1989.

    Iran's supreme leader wields control over every major decision either directly or through a network of hand-picked loyalists and institutions, including the Revolutionary Guards, the judiciary and intelligence services.

    Khamenei's fatwas, or religious edicts, are observed by followers in Iran and beyond.

    Khamenei is expected to meet a group of Iranian officials on Monday. His last public appearance was in late December when he inspected elite troops at Iran's Military Academy in Tehran.

     


         
    “Half a truth is often a great lie.”

     

    Ben Franklin

     
    8. Monday, January 8, 2007 7:35 PM
    nuart RE: Iran 2007


     Member Since
     12/18/2005
     Posts:7632

     View Profile
     Send PM

    An article from The American Thinker.  Because the author is Iranian born, it offers a fresh perspective.  I'm enjoying collecting these pearls of wisdom even if I'm the only one reading them. This article takes me back to the 70s when, in my travels, I would so often encounter protestors with photos of the Shah's brutality.  Once outside a Hyatt Hotel in San Francisco, where members of the Shah's family were ensconced, a large throng assembled to chant and protest their presence.  It really makes you wonder about all of us who sympathized back then.  Who were taken in by those people -- whoever they were -- wherever they are now -- who stood in American streets trying to shake the conscience of America to help save them from the Shah.

    Amil Imani paints a grim picture. 

    Susan 


    January 08, 2007

    What to do about Iran

    By Amil Imani
    There is no shortage of proposals regarding what to do about the present Iran conundrum. Some proposals are authored by experts such as Henry Kissinger, while others are put forward by a variety of lesser luminaries.

    I am one of the lesser luminaries. I have been observing and worrying about my country of birth, Iran, ever since a gang of murderous Mullahs and their functionaries assumed power. To my infinite regret and the regret of millions of Iranians, the situation in Iran under the fascist rule of Mullahs is rapidly deteriorating in every respect.

    The Iranians, historically among the most civilized and tolerant of mankind's peoples, are now viewed as the base recruits of a primitive seventh century barbaric campaign of Islamofascism. Iran, under the stranglehold and machinations of the Mullahs, has been transformed, in less than three decades, to the lead perpetrator of all that is abhorrent to humanity.

    The "Iran Problem," is now a world problem. The question is what to do about Iran?

    Pivotal to the success of any solution is first the realization that Islam is a religion which is not helping establish a basis for peaceful resolution. A few facts are presented below to support this assertion.
    * The Quran itself repeatedly glorifies death, killing and dying for Islam. It promises the faithful infinite rewards for his Jihad in Allah's paradise.

    * Nearly all Islamic holy days, particularly those of the Shiite sect, are observances and re-enactments associated with death.

    * The Palestinian territory is festooned with huge portraits of the "martyrs," the suicide bombers that the rest of the world calls them for what they are.

    * Streets, parks and all manners of public places in the Islamic Republic of Iran are named after "martyrs" of various sorts.

    * Sheikh Hasan Nasrullah, the leader of Hezbollah in Lebanon and the pawn of Iran's Mullahs, assured the world of Hezbollah's victory over Israel by proudly announcing: "we will prevail, because the Israelis want to live, and we relish death."
    The litany of Islamic death-based beliefs and actions is long indeed. It is, therefore, understandable that Iran's Mullahs are obsessed agents of death. Islam, the Mullahs' and their fanatic follower's system of belief, denigrates life and glorifies death. To these people, death is not death. It is martyrdom, a sure passage to the unimaginably magnificent eternal paradise promised in the Quran.

    Under the rule of these adherents of death, everything in Iran is deteriorating and dying. In spite of huge oil revenues, the per capita income of the Iranians is now about one third of what it was before the Islamic Revolution of 1979. Every form of misery has also skyrocketed. Drug addiction, prostitution and suicide have gone through the roof. The young and the educated continue deserting Iran and family, fleeing to the four corners of the earth in search of a decent life.

    To make matters worse, the agents of death, the Mullahs, divert the sorely needed funds at home to sponsor and support adventurous Islamic trouble-making abroad. They supply weapons, provide funds, and train any and all takers who share their wanton campaign of terrorism anywhere in the world.

    Dissatisfaction with the rule of the Mullahs is widespread. Students, traditionally the vanguard of political and social reform in Iran, continue their valiant struggle in the face of torture, imprisonment and death. Labor unions, although tightly controlled, are in a constant state of rebellion against the inhumane treatments by the state. Ethnic and religious minorities suffering under the ruthless Islamic injustice and Pogrom-like measures are ripe for mass eruption.

    The lifeblood of Iran's economy is oil and natural gas. The criminal neglect and squandering of these vital and irreplaceable resources holds a future of even more severe hardship for the Iranian people. Impartial expert studies show that Iran's oil production, at the present rate of exploitation and absence of maintenance, will decline by nearly ten percent per year and will hit zero by 2015.

    Corruption and mismanagement, combined with the huge allocation of resources to acquire nuclear weapons are bound to burden the country's badly ailing economy that will likely bury the Mullahs in the rubbles of their own making and grant them their death wish. Regrettably, these purveyors of death aim to hurt and kill many innocent people along the way to their inevitable looming graves.

    Over the years, much of the world has been preoccupied with its own problems and showed little concern for the plight of the Iranian people until the Mullahs installed a firebrand Islamist, Ahmadinejad, as the President of the country. This man, called by many Iranians "The Monkey," is now alarming the world by being at the control of the Islamofascist train and throttling it full speed ahead for a cataclysmic collision. Ahamadinejad and his gang are loading their guns and doing all they can to obtain the bomb to bring about the biggest and most dreadful death that would usher in the "Mahdi", their savior-ruler of the world.

    What can the world do is the huge question. Some advocate military solutions of various types, ranging from surgical bombings of Iran's nuclear facilities, to military occupation of its oil-producing regions along the Persian Gulf to a full occupation of the country. Each and every one of these trigger-happy solutions is doomed to failure, since they will play directly into the hands of the Mullahs. Any military action against Iran will encounter Iranians' fierce sense of national pride that would rally the people to the support of the regime. Military actions would compound the problem by creating a greater worldwide Islamic solidarity against the perceived "Crusaders-Zionists" conspiracy.

    There are those who see the solution in negotiation with the Mullahs. These people are either naïve or dishonest. Mullahs' negotiation is Islamic to the core. They take all and you give all since you, according to the Islamic fiat, are not entitled to anything. One can see how Muslims negotiate even among themselves in places like Iraq, the Palestinian territory, Pakistan and every other Islamic land.

    The most promising solution is in the free world's united support of the Iranian opposition groups to the rule of the Mullahs. The Iranian people themselves are fully capable and are determined to remove the cancer of Islamism from their country. The United States and Israel and other democracies have a huge stake in the success of the Iranian people to rid themselves of the Islamic tyranny.

    As I have briefly outlined above, the Mullahs are highly vulnerable. A comprehensive political, moral and economic measure by the United States and others offers the best chance of ending the Mullah's reign of terror and diffusing the existential threat they pose to the world. The Bible says, "From those who are much given, much is demanded." Perhaps it is for this reason that the people of the United States of America, once again, are called upon to make huge sacrifices to defeat another tyranny. It is important that this great nation stays the course, enlists its power in support of freedom-loving Iranians to topple the ruling Islamofascits who are bent on wreaking death and destruction of the world.

    It is also important to keep in mind Albert Einstein's warning, "The world is a dangerous place not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing."

    And when it comes to doing something the prudent way, it is good to follow the advice of the ancient Persians: "The lion of the meadow of Mazandaran can be captured by no other than a Mazadarani warrior." The best match for the ruthless Mullahs and their hired Islamic storm troopers are the Iranian warriors themselves. The people of Iran themselves are the best solution for the present Iranian conundrum. The valiant Iranians need a bit of help. And the last thing they need is appeasing negotiators to give the Mullahs a new lease on life, or invasion by the Marines, or a shower of bombs from the skies.

    Amil Imani is an Iranian-born American citizen and pro-democracy activist residing in the United States of America. He maintains a website, http://www.amilimani.com/

     


         
    “Half a truth is often a great lie.”

     

    Ben Franklin

     
    9. Monday, February 5, 2007 11:22 AM
    nuart RE: Iran 2007


     Member Since
     12/18/2005
     Posts:7632

     View Profile
     Send PM

    This story hasn't received a whole lotta coverage. It may or may not be big news. If it is as suggested by Stratfor (George Friedman's so called "private CIA") and Israel's Mossad has assassinated an Iranian nuclear scientist, it could be really big. Too soon to tell.

    But no matter how you view the Mossad or Israel's attempts to repress their enemies, if this is true, I think credit is due for creativity. All the talk these days has been whether Israel or the US would "take out" the Iranian nuclear sites. Not likely, most sources said. Too many; too deeply buried. Not likely for countless reasons. Taking out the individual human beings responsible for building up the nukes? Now that is clever! Imagine if Nazi sabateurs had been able to make their way to Los Alamos back in early 1940s and wiped out the Manhattan Project. Smart!

    Here are two versions of the same story. So far. There were only 20-some articles on this story. So far. The first story from the London Sunday Times broke the Stratfor story. The link to the second article is from AlJazeera.com . (not the better known and more reputable AlJazeera.net.) If you have the time, make sure to check out the charming comments from readers that follow the article.

    Then if you have even more time, see the contrasting Jersualem Post story . This one has an instructive photograph of a few of the Iranian women who stand hand in hand as human shields surrounding the Isfahan nuclear site. The Jerusalem Post dispassionately reports essentially the same information, with the intention, I'm sure, of reinforcing the veracity. Whether they KNOW it to be true, this time it may be in their interest to feed the common fantasy of an all-powerful ubiquitous Mossad.

    I like this story...

    Susan

    February 04, 2007

    Iranian nuclear scientist ‘assassinated by Mossad’


         
    “Half a truth is often a great lie.”

     

    Ben Franklin

     
    10. Monday, February 5, 2007 4:19 PM
    Raymond RE: Iran 2007


     Member Since
     12/18/2005
     Posts:1664

     View Profile
     Send PM
    OK, I have my calendar marked for the 11th. Will the 12th Imam reemerge ?

     
    11. Wednesday, February 7, 2007 6:21 PM
    nuart RE: Iran 2007


     Member Since
     12/18/2005
     Posts:7632

     View Profile
     Send PM

     It's always gratifying to read/hear the dissenting view.  Here from a London Arabic paper.

    Susan 

     

    THE MIDDLE EAST MEDIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    Special Dispatch Series - No. 1455
    February 8, 2007 No.1455
    Columnist Hassan Haydar: Iran Spreads a 'Culture of Death'

    In an article published February 1, 2007 in the English edition of the London daily Al-Hayat, columnist Hassan Haydar denounced the "culture of death" that Iran is spreading in the Arab world by means of the resistance movements in Lebanon and in Palestine.

    The following are excerpts from the article, as they appeared in English: [1]

    "According to a Reuters news report from Monday, a little Lebanese girl who appeared on a... children's show on Al-Manar - Hezbollah's TV channel - said that she had often prayed for her father to be martyred in battle with Israel, and that she was very proud that he was killed in the war last July, and that she was 'very happy for him,' because she felt that God had heard her prayers.

    "The mother of the Palestinian suicide bomber who blew himself up in Eilat three days ago also told Agence France-Presse that she was happy her son was martyred. She revealed that she had said goodbye [to him] before he left for his mission and had wished him success, and that she was happy that 'God had heard her prayers.'

    "These two examples are no different from the Iranian 'human waves,' in which the victims wore keys to Paradise around their necks as they marched through Iraqi minefields. They are also no different from the majority of operations that have been carried out by the Lebanese and Palestinian Islamic resistance movements over the last two decades."

     

    "[The Culture of Death] Reflects a State of Collective Psychological Detachment, in Which a Child Can Celebrate the Loss of a Father and a Mother the Loss of a Son"

    "Most important, such examples confirm the growing influence that Tehran has today, and the extent to which the culture of death and the glorification of martyrdom have proliferated in more than one Arab country. [Tehran spreads this culture by] exploiting its sectarian affiliation... with Shi'ites in Iraq and Lebanon, and [by means of its support of] the Palestinian Hamas and the Islamic Jihad movements.

    "The culture [of death] is not limited to local professional fighters engaged in armed conflict with an enemy, but has spread to affect entire communities - including mothers and children, schools and television, newspapers, poetry, art and music. The significance of this [lies] in distorting the concept of struggle itself, denying people the right to make rational and mature choices, and demeaning everything other than martyrdom, including political and social efforts aimed at improving the conditions of these communities and their members' living standards.

    "It is also a culture that reflects a state of collective psychological detachment, in which a child can celebrate the loss of a father and a mother [can celebrate] the loss of a son, which [goes] against human nature and culture.

    "But in stark contrast, the media apparatuses of the same Iran-affiliated movements express admiration for American anti-war groups and for mothers of American soldiers demanding the return of their children, just as they emphasized last summer's protests by Israeli mothers who opposed the Israeli army's involvement in a ground war in Lebanon, praising the influence of such actions on society as a whole and on the Israeli decision-making process.

    "In doing this, these media apparatuses essentially condemn the very same concepts that they try to advocate, since the American and Israel anti-war protests promote the sanctity of life and the desire to protect life in face of all the justifications of the American and Israeli governments.

    "The validity of the reasons behind the animosity toward Israel cannot be disputed, and opposing its repeated aggression often means accepting the eventuality of death and destruction. A problem arises, however, when death becomes the only weapon and deterrent, and a goal in itself, while [the taking of] life should be the last card resorted to, and [should be resorted to] only if fighting is the only way to improve the standards of this life.

    "We might ask: How will this child, who was raised to exalt and glamorize death, be able to conform to the rules of a work place, or comply with public law, or harmonize with a civil society later in life?

    "How will such a child be able to appreciate the value of a tree, a house, a field, a road, a bridge, a public square, or any of the normal things... that surrounding him?

    "What Lebanon went through last summer and what is currently taking place in the heart of Beirut and in its alleys - are these not examples of what a child nurtured on the culture of death is capable of doing?"


    [1] Al-Hayat, February 1, 2007. The text has been edited for clarity


         
    “Half a truth is often a great lie.”

     

    Ben Franklin

     
    12. Friday, March 16, 2007 2:05 PM
    nuart RE: Iran 2007


     Member Since
     12/18/2005
     Posts:7632

     View Profile
     Send PM

    Not sure WHAT they're saying but I get the point of the "=" sign. This is a so-called gender apartheid protest in Tehran. A very good sign indeed! These are scales that need a bit of balancing throughout the Middle East. Iran is as good a place as any to find this type of congregation.

    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x19h90_feminist-protest-gender-apartheid

    A corresponding article to explain why they're protesting.  Btw, the V hand symbol is not what we often think of as a "peace symbol" but rather is a "V" for Victory hand signal. 

    Susan


         
    “Half a truth is often a great lie.”

     

    Ben Franklin

     
    13. Saturday, March 17, 2007 9:53 AM
    Raymond RE: Iran 2007


     Member Since
     12/18/2005
     Posts:1664

     View Profile
     Send PM

    Maybe i have missed all the coverage on women's rights in Islamic lands by the American feminists and the far left all these years. Probably some blurb tucked away here or there. They sure aren't in the streets in solidarity for human rights. Instead they appear to support the oppressors or do...nothing. That strange marriage of far left and far right ?

    Women had more rights in Iran under the Shah. 70 % of college students in Iran are women and they have power albeit stifled. Watch out for the women- they are pretty cool and gutsy.

     

    New Topic | Post Reply Page 1 of 1 :: << | 1 | >>
    Politics > Iran 2007


    Users viewing this Topic (0)


    This page was generated in 234 ms.