Home | Register | Login | Members  

Politics > Death Penalty - California & Florida Style
New Topic | Post Reply
<< | 1 | >>  
1. Thursday, March 8, 2007 11:11 AM
nuart Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

This could expand to other states but I'm going to begin with cases I know in the state of California. The other day, when discussing the death penalty in regard to Saddam Hussein's execution, I brought up the typically looooooong period of time after a death penalty sentencing and the ultimate execution of a first degree murderer. And I pointed out the case of Kevin Cooper, who should have been executed in February 2004 for his 1983 murder had it not been for one last appeal -- the pitiful additional testing of blonde hairs clutched in the hand of the 11 year old blonde victim who was hacked to death with an axe and some additional more sophisticated blood testing. Within a few hours of his lethal injection, a far more sedate manner of death than being chased down the hall of your home and axed to death, Lani Davis, former Clinton counsel, secured a stay of execution for what was hoped to be that final exculpatory evidence. It was not to be and Kevin Cooper went back where he belonged -- not to freedom but back onto the death row waiting list.

Flash forward two years. I happened to read this article today about the latest attempts to keep this quadruple murderer alive. This man who brutally cut up a family and a neighbor's 11-year-old child while slashing the throat of one 8-year old victim who survived. Here are the latest machinations, if you can stomach them.

Once you've thought this one over and can tell me why deserves to breathe one more day, I'll tell you another story fresh from today's non-headlines. It's about skin-head Aryan Brotherhood lifers who order additional murders from behind bars and upon conviction of the latest murders, another life sentence.

The 9th Court of Appeals is notorious for its rulings. Below just one egregious example.

With a headline that could as easily read, "Yeah, He Was Framed! That's the Ticket!" ...

Death row inmate's lawyer says his client was framed

The attorney requests that Kevin Cooper's case be returned to a lower court for further review.
By Henry Weinstein
Times Staff Writer

January 10, 2007

SAN FRANCISCO — More than 20 years after Kevin Cooper was sentenced to death for brutally murdering four people in Chino Hills, his attorney told a federal appeals panel Tuesday that questions about the case remained unresolved and that Cooper was entitled to further hearings and testing to clear up the mysteries.

During oral arguments before the panel, defense lawyer Norman Hile suggested that Cooper had been framed, that prosecutors at trial withheld material evidence that could have cleared him, and that his client had not received a full and fair hearing from U.S. District Judge Marilyn Huff in San Diego, the last jurist to consider the case.

But a veteran appellate lawyer for the California attorney general's office countered that Cooper was "guilty as sin" and that it was time to bring the case — which has been the subject of numerous appeals — to a close. "Enough is enough," said Deputy Atty. Gen. Holly D. Wilkens.

Cooper was sentenced to death in Riverside County Superior Court for a 1983 rampage in which a married couple and two children were hacked to death in Chino Hills.

Prosecutors alleged at trial that Cooper, then serving time for burglary, had faked a medical condition to escape from the state prison in Chino in 1983, then took refuge in a small house with a view of the hilltop home of Douglas and Peggy Ryen.

Two nights later, prosecutors stated, he broke into the Ryens' home and used a hatchet, knife and ice pick to kill the couple; their daughter, Jessica, 11; and houseguest Christopher Hughes, 11.

Prosecutors said Cooper also slashed the throat of the Ryens' 8-year-old son, Joshua, who lay next to his mother's body for 11 hours before he was found. He survived and later testified against Cooper.

Cooper, now 49, admits that he hid in the house near the Ryen residence. But he has steadfastly maintained that he hitchhiked out of the area and that he was not involved in the murders.

In February 2004, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, by a vote of 9 to 2, granted a last-minute stay of execution and ordered new testing of blood and hair evidence in the case. At the time, Barry Silverman, one of the judges in the majority, said: "Cooper is either guilty as sin or he was framed by the police. There is no middle ground."

More than a year later, after hearing testimony from 42 witnesses and reviewing test results, Huff in San Diego concluded in a 150-page ruling that Cooper should not receive any legal relief from the courts.

Noting post-conviction DNA testing that linked Cooper to a drop of blood in the hallway outside the Ryens' bedroom, saliva from cigarette butts found in the hallway and blood smears on a T-shirt abandoned outside a bar near the murder scene, Huff wrote that she was convinced that Cooper "is the one responsible for these brutal murders." She added that Cooper "is simply making unsubstantiated allegations of tampering as to evidence that was used against him at trial, or that subsequently confirmed his guilt from post-conviction DNA testing."

But Cooper's lawyers contend that Huff abused her discretion by denying some discovery and additional forensic testing. Hile, the defense lawyer, urged the appeals court to send the case back to Huff and order further testing, as well as admission of evidence about "three suspicious men," one wearing bloody clothes, who reportedly were seen shortly after the murders in a bar not far from the crime scene.

The three judges hearing the appeal are Pamela Ann Rymer of Pasadena, an appointee of former President George H.W. Bush; Margaret McKeown of San Diego, an appointee of Bill Clinton; and Ronald Gould of Seattle, also a Clinton appointee. Whatever they decide, the ruling is likely to be appealed to a larger 9th Circuit panel and eventually to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Rymer and Gould, both of whom rejected Cooper's bid for a stay in 2003, appeared skeptical Tuesday of defense claims of evidence-tampering.

McKeown asked several questions related to footprints of Keds shoes found inside the home and on a spa cover outside the master bedroom. Prosecutors stated at trial that the shoes were prison-issue and could not have been bought from a store.

Hile said Tuesday that when the former warden of the prison at Chino heard the prosecutors' contention, she called the San Bernardino County sheriff's office to tell them that the shoes could have been bought at a store. The defense was not informed of the call, a violation of the prosecution's obligation to turn over any potentially exculpatory evidence, Hile said.

Deputy Atty. Gen. Wilkens countered that there was no doubt Cooper was wearing that type of shoe at the time of the murders. Even if the shoe was commercially available, it proves nothing, she said.

After the hearing, a group of death penalty foes, some holding placards proclaiming "Free Kevin Now," held a rally outside the courthouse. Attorney Natasha Minsker, the death penalty coordinator for the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, said it was very troubling that there were so many unresolved questions about the case so long after the murders.

She said the case showed that the state had "insufficient standards and safeguards" for the handling of forensic evidence. That issue, and related ones, are to be taken up in Sacramento today at a hearing of the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice.

*

 


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
2. Friday, January 12, 2007 10:22 PM
nuart RE: Death Penalty - California Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

Okay, here's another story.  The Aryan Brotherhood mentioned above were convicted of their racketeering charges this week.  Here's an earlier article with a brief description of their crimes and the circus-like trial.  

Ah well, what's another life sentence to a lifer?  Maybe they've learned their lessons now! 

Susan 

Jury gets Aryan Brotherhood case

The trial focused on a series of murders that Robert 'Blinky' Griffin and John 'Youngster' Stinson allegedly used to maintain order.
 
By Joe Mozingo and Peter Y. Hong
Times Staff Writers

December 20, 2006

The case against two alleged leaders of the Aryan Brotherhood prison gang in California went to a jury Tuesday after six weeks of gruesome and bizarre testimony that painted prison gang life as a predatory dystopia where one must kill or be killed.

Robert "Blinky" Griffin, 59, and John "Youngster" Stinson, 52, are accused of ordering a series of murders to maintain discipline within the gang and, in doing so, strengthen its power and expand its drug-trafficking and extortion rackets.

If convicted on the racketeering charges, they could receive life in prison without the possibility of parole. Stinson is already serving a sentence of life without parole for a Long Beach murder. Griffin, who has been in prison since 1970, could be paroled in several years.

In court, the two wore sweater vests and sports jackets and tapped at laptop computers while a circus of cursing, hulking, tattooed inmates testified against them. Griffin's attorney called those witnesses a "parade of liars" in his closing statement.

He hammered at payments and favors the government gave to witnesses in exchange for their testimony and pointed out their past acts of perjury.

Assistant U.S. Atty. Mark Aveis conceded that many of the former Aryan brothers testifying against the defendants had credibility problems. One witness, Clifford Smith, who admitted killing 20 people in prison, was caught in a significant lie during a recent death penalty case. But Aveis said the totality of the testimony and physical evidence, including numerous letters and written messages, collected in the course of an eight-year investigation, prove the two were leaders of "an Aryan Brotherhood conspiracy."

He called Griffin "the emeritus figure in the A.B." — who got the nickname Blinky because he could order a hit simply by blinking.

This is the second major trial resulting from a 2002 indictment meant to break the gang that started in California and spread throughout the U.S.

The current case, being heard in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, has focused solely on the California faction. Prosecutors alleged that while Griffin, Stinson and other Aryan Brotherhood members were housed at the California Institution for Men at Chino in 1982, they hatched a plan to become more disciplined and more organized.

Two murders that year were seminal, prosecutors said.

When the gang could not get to a former member named Steven Barnes, who had testified against Griffin and was in protective custody, prosecutors said, member Curtis Price went to Barnes' family's home in Temple City and shot his father to death. The message was that if the gang couldn't get a snitch, it would go after his family.

That second was the killing of brotherhood member Steven "Loser" Clark, who was too high on heroin to trust anymore, according to testimony.

Four other murders in the 1980s and 1990s were key to the case. The defense argued that the murders had nothing to do with a conspiracy and that the men convicted of those crimes were now depicting the killings as a conspiracy only to get favors from the government.

"The government is presenting you a fraud," Stinson lawyer Terrence Bennett told jurors.

 


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
3. Wednesday, February 7, 2007 1:28 PM
nuart RE: Death Penalty - California Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

This time not just California but I noticed AOL has a death penalty poll this morning. Here are the results so far:

What's your view on the death penalty?
It's humane72%
It's cruel15%
Not sure13%

Interesting...

Susan

 

PS Haha, sorry, Raymond. You know sometimes you have to choose a color in order for a cut and paste article to show up. I didn't get the numbers last time around.  As of 12:27 pm PST, there are 81,000 votes with the same percentile breakdown.


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
4. Wednesday, February 7, 2007 11:51 AM
Raymond RE: Death Penalty - California Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:1664

 View Profile
 Send PM
Interesting poll Susan. Now, how about the breakdown ???

 
5. Thursday, March 8, 2007 11:19 AM
nuart RE: Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

Okay, I've expanded the subject to Florida so as to bring in this John Cooey murder conviction. Read the following article...

Sex offender guilty in Fla. girl‘s death

Staff and agencies
08 March, 2007

By CURT ANDERSON, Associated Press Writer

MIAMI - The sex offender convicted of kidnapping, raping and then killing 9-year-old Jessica Lunsford by burying her alive behind his trailer could now face the death penalty.

"With capital cases, I‘m all for the death penalty. It‘s an eye for an eye," the girl‘s father, Mark Lunsford, said Thursday on CBS‘ "The Early Show."

The little girl had been clutching a purple stuffed dolphin when she suffocated but had managed to poke two fingers through the bag.

In court Wednesday, Couey stared straight ahead and swayed slightly as the verdicts were read on charges of first-degree murder, sexual battery on a child, kidnapping and burglary. Lunsford, who has helped push efforts for tougher monitoring of sex offenders, showed no emotion.

Circuit Judge Richard Howard will ultimately decide Couey‘s sentence. He is not required to follow the jury‘s recommendation, but judges typically give the recommendation great legal weight.

He admitted to investigators shortly after his arrest that he committed the crime, but the confession was thrown out because he did not have a lawyer present as he had requested.

The evidence at trial included DNA from Jessica‘s blood and Couey‘s semen on a mattress in his bedroom, as well as Jessica‘s fingerprints in a closet in the trailer.

Couey had previously been arrested in 1991 on a charge of fondling a child. In 1978, he was accused of grabbing a girl in her bedroom, placing his hand over her mouth and kissing her. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison in the case but paroled in 1980.

Mark Lunsford, Jessica‘s father, is now working with the group "Stop Child Predators," which advocates for stricter penalties and an integrated nationwide sex offender registry.

"I can‘t get my hands on the guy that murdered my daughter so I‘ve made it my job to make the rest of these sexual offenders and predators‘ lives miserable, as miserable as I can," he said.

-- -- -- --

...and now tell me if any one can say this man should remain alive.

Fortunately, this case is being decided in Florida where they not only have the death penalty but where they also implement it and do not allow for the California style of 20+ years of living and breathing on death row.  We can expect his death penalty sentence to be delivered shortly and his removal from the planet to follow within a reasonable time span.

Susan


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
6. Thursday, March 8, 2007 8:21 PM
herofix RE: Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:2500

 View Profile
 Send PM

I have to be honest, I didn't read the gruesome details.

 For me (anti-death penalty), I'm not so fussed about whether I think someone 'deserves' this or that, or the cruelty angle.  It's just that it is totally irreversible and plenty of people have been, ahem, penalised this way who never dunnit.  You can't even give them a load of dosh once you realise you f'ed up, 'cause they're, like, dead.

Also, you can barely trust the government to not get your tax return wrong, or understand your point when you argue that all the new solar powered parking meters were out of order.  These people (by which I mean, any people) shouldn't have the power to kill anybody. 

 Also,...... not a deterrent.  Am I right?  Of course I'm right.  Unless you really ratchet up the heavy-handed law and order vibe with instant executions etc., maybe a bit of cat o' nine tails for your common car thief......not my idea of a wonderful kind of society, though.  Even though, no doubt, if you've done nothing wrong you'd have no reason to be afraid. =)


An Inverted Pyramid of Piffle
 
7. Thursday, March 8, 2007 10:51 PM
nuart RE: Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM
Like I always say to those who reject the death penalty by saying there's a chance the state may be responsible for executing an innocent individual, I accept that truth.  I admit that the remote possibility exists.
 
But those of you who would allow all murderers to live, must also acknowledge an even more likely prospect. By leaving murderers to live out their lives, additional innocent blood may end up on your hands as a result of such "compassion" or lack of faith in the judicial process. For it is a given that some number of those murderers will murder guards, other inmates and may even escape to kill again. In fact, while there are several instances of convicted murderers killing within prison and ordering killing from their cells, I know of no known cases trumpeted of the wrongfully executed US death row prisoners within the past say 60 years. (Earlier cases?  Maybe.  It's possible.  But I haven't heard of them either.)  If there were any who were actually executed for murders they did not commit -- they would be the poster boys for the anti-death penalty movement.
 
The last potential candidate for that coveted role, I wrote about here once before. He was executed over twenty years ago. Before his execution Time magazine had his face plastered on the cover with the caption "THIS MAN IS ABOUT TO BE EXECUTED -- AND HE MAY BE INNOCENT! The governor of his state allowed for retroactive post-humous DNA testing last year. The newest cutting edge up-to-date testing. Oops. It came back the same as the old DNA. Yup, he raped and murdered his teenage sister-in-law. Or, if a mistake was made, he raped his sister-in-law and within moments, someone else came in and murdered her. Suppose it could have happened that way. With the same circumstances in Los Angeles court room, I doubt if such a crime would be charged as a death penalty case since the ultimate punishment is generally reserved for multiple victims, child victims, particularly heinous murders, and lying in wait murders.
 
Of course the cruelty of the crime -- the details that are so icky to read -- are part of the consideration of the punishment, just as the defendant's criminal past, mental well being and a host of other mitigating factors.
 
Oh, one other thing. Here in the US, the IRS is not the same branch of government that arrests, charges, prosecutes, sentences, imprisons or executes a convicted murderer. The single largest employer of Americans is the GOVERNMENT and as such, they are probably no better or worse than most large institutions composed of humans.
 
Fortunately, it is a jury of twelve who collectively make the decisions about a murderer's guilt. They are not the amorphous government except in the abstract as in 'we the people.'  Sometimes, it is a second jury of twelve who makes the decision. It is judges who read countless appeals. Courts of appeals. All the way up to 9 members of the Supreme Court, who probably can also make mistakes. BUT, this is why the death penalty is and should be reserved not only for the worst of the first degree murderers but ALSO for those most obviously proven to have commited the crimes for which they are charged. Like the killer of Jessica Lundsford. Who confessed. Whose semen was found in the dead 9-year-old's body. Whose body was found in a plastic bag buried outside his house.  Yuck.
 
Susan


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
8. Friday, March 9, 2007 4:36 PM
herofix RE: Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:2500

 View Profile
 Send PM

That's pretty gross.

We don't really know whether anybody has been wrongfully executed.  It's not like a box on Deal or No Deal where the objective truth of whether they did or not is written on a card inside their head when you crack it open.  Countless examples of those who definitely did do it are well and good, but that doesn't work for all cases.  What you say you can accept, (about that unfortunate possibility) is just a non-starter for me.


An Inverted Pyramid of Piffle
 
9. Friday, March 9, 2007 6:27 PM
nuart RE: Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

What you say you can accept, (about that unfortunate possibility) is just a non-starter for me.

Yes, but...

Andrew, you ignore your unfortunate part of the quotient. It's tit for tat. On your side, more dead innocents are a given supported by real facts. On mine, I admit to the POSSIBILITY of a mistaken execution because there is ALWAYS such a remote chance in the real world.

On your side, you can argue that at least the state was not responsible for any additional killings committed by convicted murderers who would be allowed to stay alive by your set of standards. But at the end of the day, your position is more akin to the hired killer who did not dirty his own hands but allowed for the commission of additional crimes.

At least with my position, no anti-death penalty org has found the egregious example of an innocent man/woman who has actually been executed. With your position, there are plenty of scattered bodies to argue against allowing this one particular breed of first degree murderers to live.

But I already said as much in my earlier post. Maybe you are working on the construction of a philosophical argument that makes the death of a prison guard by a would-be death row inmate a messy but preferable option to taking the life of a heinous murderer. It seems to me that is far more gross.

Anyway, for me, that aspect of the death penalty is not the primary reason I am pro-death penalty.  For me, it is only just that those who so cravenly and brutally take the lives of others, have abdicated their own right to continue theirs.  

Susan


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
10. Sunday, March 11, 2007 9:32 AM
jordan RE: Death Penalty - California & Florida Style

 Admin
 Member Since
 12/17/2005
 Posts:2274

 View Profile
 Send PM

With DNA and cameras everywhere, the argument of "could he be innocent" is slowly losing any real traction. Just this past week, there were a copule of violent crimes caught on camera phones - including a stabbing rampage in a store. Then you have that youth (who also happened to be Muslim and for some reason the news didn't jump on that part too hard) who went into a Utah mall and killed people. Once again, caught on video.

So as DNA investigation gets better and more and more cameras get thrown around, the argument of possibly executing an innocent person becomes weaker and weaker.

A philosophical argument is one thing, but  reality is completely different.


Jordan .

 
11. Sunday, March 11, 2007 9:47 AM
herofix RE: Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:2500

 View Profile
 Send PM
Not sure if we got our wires crossed here, but I probably wasn't clear enough. When I said 'pretty gross' I was talking about what happened to Jessica Lungford, not 'the possibility you were willing to accept'. It was a comment without snark.

Well, I have to admit that in all the years I've heard people arguing about this subject, I've never come across the 'other people will die because a murderer is not killed' argument.

It's a good argument, I'll give it that. It is, I think, the best argument I've ever heard for the death penalty.

Of course, not conceding just yet, and if we're going to argue on the grounds of utilitarianism and not moral imperatives, then I need to know how many people are killed by prisoners convicted of murder, and how many of those are innocents, and how many of them are other convicted murderers on death row.

-Andrew


An Inverted Pyramid of Piffle
 
12. Sunday, March 11, 2007 11:29 AM
nuart RE: Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

Oh, okay. Glad to hear the pretty gross was a reaction to the rape/murder and not my belief that the murdering child-rapist should pay with his life. Or that it is pretty gross that I have to live with my end of the societal bargain -- the repellent, though remote, possibility of a mistaken conviction and execution.

Let me get this straight though. If the murder victim of an incarcerated, convicted, first degree murderer, would-have-been death row inmate is also a convicted murderer, is this killing less abhorrent than killing a guard or a lawyer, for example? And following that line of reasoning, if the victim is just a bank robber, do the scales tilt a little more toward unjust since the victim only took money and not lives? By the logic, the state is also culpable for not having provided a secure enough environment to ensure the life of that convict they were prohibited from killing themselves. In such a case, I think it might be more thoughtful to go with the sensitive last meal gesture followed by a gentle lethal injection. All of this is the utilitarian angle.

Even from the moral imperative angle, I find it a more compelling argument to assert that the death penalty is a more just solution for a society than keeping every single murderer alive regardless of the barbarity of their crimes against the people. If you argue it from the secular humanist view, than I'm not sure what your basis is for maintaining the "sacred" quality of every life. And if you argue it from a Judeo-Christian angle (which you're clearly not), I see even less evidence.

Murderers murdering fellow inmates is against my code of ethics, Andrew. Though I believe it would have been just for Jeffrey Dahmer to be executed by the state for his confessed crimes, I was appalled by his murder by inmates. One of my personal concerns is for the safety of inmates, as odd as it may seem. Whenever a high profile child molestation case is discussed, there's always someone who snickers, "Don't worry.  The other prisoners will take care of him!" Since mistaken convictions are more often found in non-capital cases, the idea of an innocent incarcerated victim of such circumstances being gang-raped or beaten to death while in the state's custody, goes against all notions of the penal code I believe in. FEH!  This is the kind of prison reform I care about along with genuine rehabilitation of those who are ultimately going back into society.

Susan


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
13. Monday, April 9, 2007 10:12 AM
nuart RE: Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

Remember Jimmy Lee Smith? Probably not. His partner in crime -- Gregory Powell -- was played by James Woods. The guy who played Jimmy died of AIDS and never made much of a mark in his acting career. Maybe you saw the movie -- The Onion Field.

Oh, but there was a real life crime on which the book/movie was based. Murder. Cop murder. That used to pretty much guarantee a death penalty upon conviction and that's how it went with both Smith and Powell back in the 1960s. This was before the 'cruel and unusual' California Supreme Court ruling overturning the death penalties of Smith and Powell, along with the Manson Family and so many others in the 1970s.

Yet another case where the anti-death penalty foes have more victims on their hands. In this case, not dead victims but who knows? Still, consider the obituary of high-profile murderer, Jimmy Lee Smith, as recorded with two accompanying photographs, in yesterday's LA Times. FEH.

Gotta wonder how many other Jimmy Lee Smiths are out there who never had movies made out of their crimes. 

Susan

OBITUARIES

Jimmy Lee Smith, 76; 'Onion Field' killer

Public outrage greeted his parole, which he violated repeatedly. He was again in jail when he died.
By Sam Quinones
Times Staff Writer

April 8, 2007

Jimmy Lee Smith, one of the notorious "Onion Field" killers, whose crime was documented in a best-selling book and a movie and who spent most of his life in and out of prison on repeated parole violations, has died. He was 76.

Smith died Friday of a heart attack in the Pitchess Detention Center in Castaic, where he had been detained for yet another parole violation, according to Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department officials.

Smith led a life of petty crime and drug abuse, interrupted by the high-profile killing of Los Angeles Police Officer Ian Campbell in the early '60s.

Joseph Wambaugh's 1973 book "The Onion Field" chronicled the case and was later made into a movie.

"Great. Wonderful," former L.A. Police Chief Daryl Gates said when told of Smith's death. "He was a hype and murderer, and we let him out of prison. He should have gone to his death in the gas chamber."

The crime occurred in March 1963.

Campbell and his partner, Officer Karl Hettinger, stopped a car for making an illegal U-turn in Hollywood. Two stick-up men — Smith, 32, on parole from Folsom State Prison, and Gregory Powell, 29 — were in the vehicle.

Powell disarmed Campbell after pulling a gun on him. Threatening to kill Campbell, he forced Hettinger to give up his weapon.

Powell and Smith drove the two officers to an onion field in Kern County, where Powell shot Campbell once in the face.

One of the men fired four more shots into Campbell, killing him. Powell always said it was Smith, who denied it.

Hettinger began running through the field and escaped as Powell fired at him.

Hettinger said a cloud passing in front of the moon allowed him enough darkness to hide in some bushes. He then ran four miles to a farmhouse, where he called for help.

Powell was captured a couple of hours later, driving back to Los Angeles.

Smith was arrested the next day at a Bakersfield rooming house.

Smith and Powell were convicted of murder and sentenced to death. But in the 1970s, those sentences were reduced to life in prison after the California Supreme Court outlawed the death penalty.

Hettinger lived with crushing bouts of depression, feeling ashamed for having run from the scene. The feeling was seconded by Los Angeles Police Department higher-ups at the time, who treated him as a coward, outraging Wambaugh, then an LAPD vice officer.

Later in life, Hettinger rebounded somewhat, winning election as a Kern County supervisor in 1987. He died in 1994 of cirrhosis, at age 59.

"He never really escaped the onion field," Wambaugh said in an interview Saturday. "Physically he survived, but emotionally he never recovered."

Powell remains in prison. His latest bid for parole was denied in January.

Smith was paroled in 1982, despite public outrage.

"The state had no business allowing him out," Gates said Saturday.

Wambaugh reported that when an old guard at Folsom prison chided Smith for returning there after killing Campbell, Smith replied, "I was born for the prison yard."

"That's probably the story of Jimmy Lee Smith," Wambaugh said. "He started out behind the eight ball and ended up there."

Throughout his life, Smith, a longtime drug abuser, displayed a chronic inability to adapt to life on the streets; he became a symbol for what many considered the state's lax prison sentencing laws.

Smith was born in Texas and raised by his maternal great-aunt. At 16, he ran away to Los Angeles, where he was picked up for burglary and sent to Juvenile Hall.

In 1950 he was arrested for burglary, then again for narcotics possession.

In 1952, arrested again for burglary, he was convicted and sent to San Quentin State Prison. He was paroled, then violated parole.

According to a 1963 Los Angeles Times story, he had been arrested for narcotics possession in 1959 under the alias James Youngblood and told police afterward, "I'm here because I can't adjust to everyday life outside. I need help badly."

In February 1963, two weeks before he and Powell killed Campbell, Smith was again paroled. He then spent 19 years in prison for the killing before his release in 1982.

However, time in prison apparently did nothing to slake Smith's thirst for dope.

Four months after that parole, he failed a drug test and was returned to prison.

After serving six months, he was paroled again, only to be rearrested in Long Beach on drug charges. He later pleaded guilty to two counts of selling heroin and was sentenced to five years in prison.

He was released in 1986, then arrested in Burbank in 1987 and convicted of driving while under the influence of a narcotic.

In 1989, on parole again, he was arrested for terrorizing a woman he held captive over a weekend in West Covina.

In 1990, yet again on parole, he was arrested in Van Nuys for threatening a man with a knife.

The pattern continued through the 1990s.


The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation announced in December that it was looking for him because of another parole violation.

In February, Los Angeles police arrested him for a parole violation on skid row, where he'd apparently been living on the street.

Wambaugh said Smith's death took him back to the writing of "The Onion Field," his first nonfiction book, for which he took a leave of absence from the LAPD.

"I don't know how I feel about it yet," he said. "I just keep thinking there's only one left" from that night in the onion field.


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
14. Monday, April 9, 2007 10:25 AM
nuart RE: Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

Then there is the case for life in prison.  Take Lawrence Singleton -- please.  Nah, it's too late.  He's dead.  Allowed to die in a hospital after being transferred from Florida's death row, where he belonged. 

Back a few decades ago, there was a good case to be made for a life sentence after he raped a 15-year-old  girl, chopped off both her arms and left her to nearly bleed to death along a roadside in California.  Hey, he didn't murder her. He just attempted to murder her.  The level of mayhem he perpetrated on this young girl should have qualified him for life in prison, but he was paroled after serving 8 years of a 14+ year sentence. 

Read on...

Lawrence Singleton, despised rapist, dies

He chopped off teenager's arms in 1978

Michael Taylor, Chronicle Staff Writer 

Tuesday, January 1, 2002

Lawrence Singleton, who wrote his own unique chapter in the annals of depravity when he chopped off the forearms of California teenager Mary Vincent after raping her, has died of cancer in a Florida prison hospital.

Singleton, who was 74, had been transferred to the hospital from Florida's death row at the North Florida Reception Center, where he was awaiting execution for the 1997 murder of a 31-year-old prostitute in his Tampa home. He died on Friday.

'He had a deeply ingrained hatred and dislike of women,' said Assistant Attorney General Scott Browne, who represented Florida in Singleton's appeal of his death sentence. The Florida Supreme upheld the sentence last year, rejecting the claim that he didn't get a fair trial because of notoriety from the California crime.

Notorious was something of an understatement -- Singleton was reviled in California. And his victim, Mary Vincent, has spent the past 23 years in a series of nightmares, worried that some day Singleton would find her and the whole thing would start over.

'She had a constant fear of her life from Lawrence Singleton,' said Mark E. Edwards, the California attorney who once represented Vincent.

As well she should have. After testifying against Singleton, Vincent, still a teenager, had to walk past him in the courtroom as he sat with his lawyer. He whispered something to her. She suddenly turned pale and fled the courtroom.

Later, she told a prosecutor Singleton had said, 'I'll finish this job if it takes me the rest of my life.'

Nonetheless, 20 years later, Vincent volunteered to come out of her sporadic hiding to testify in the death penalty phase of Singleton's Florida trial.

Asked what happened to her on Del Puerto Canyon Road in California, she said, 'I was attacked, I was raped, and my hands were cut off. He left me to die.' Then she lifted one of her prosthetic arms, pointed it at Singleton and identified him to the jury.

The murder of Roxanne Hayes was covered by the national press largely because of Singleton's near-homicidal mayhem that took place after a car ride between Berkeley and rural Stanislaus County on Sept. 29, 1978.

VINCENT'S HORRIFYING ORDEAL

Singleton, at the time a merchant seaman, picked up 15-year-old Vincent in Berkeley and drove her to an isolated area a few miles west of Patterson and not far from Interstate 5.

There he bludgeoned her, then raped her and then used a hatchet to chop off her arms just below the elbows. Then he dragged her down into a culvert, where he left her, apparently thinking she would die from the trauma he had just inflicted on her body. And, besides, as investigators later deduced from Singleton's crude modus operandi, if she had no hands, it would be difficult to identify her from fingerprints.

But she didn't die. She managed to get out of the culvert and started walking toward the distant noise of I-5 traffic, her bloody stumps hanging down from her shoulders. People in the first car that saw her were so horrified they turned around and fled. People in the second car stopped and got her to a hospital.

CONVICTED IN 1979

In March 1979, a San Diego jury convicted Singleton of kidnaping, mayhem, attempted murder, forcible rape, sodomy and forced oral copulation.

Singleton was so notorious in California for his singular act that when he was paroled to Contra Costa County in 1987, after serving a bit more than half of his 14-year prison sentence, town after town refused to allow him to settle there and he finally served out his parole in a trailer on the grounds of San Quentin prison. Singleton moved to Florida shortly after that.

For Mary Vincent, it didn't matter that he was 3,000 miles away. As long as he was somewhere, she was terrified.

She moved to Washington state and married a landscape designer in 1987, but that marriage did not last more than three years. She was so paralyzed with fear that she had difficulty leaving her home for routine errands. Eventually, she moved into an derelict gas station near Tacoma. Then she became anorexic, her weight plunging to below 100 pounds.

VICTIM'S LIFE CHANGED

In the late 1990s, she moved to Orange County and got a job clerking in the local district attorney's office, where she eventually met investigator Tom Wilson, whom she later married. Stable in her new job and marriage, she became more outgoing and formed the Mary Vincent Foundation to help victims of traumatic crime.

'When (Singleton) was incarcerated,' said Richard Breshears, assistant sheriff of Stanislaus County and the lead investigator into the case in 1978, 'she changed dramatically, from someone who looked like she was at death's door to someone who began experiencing life and looking robust.'

'This,' he said of Singleton's death, 'kind of seals the deal for her.'

Recently, according to friends, she got divorced and moved back up to Washington, settling in the Seattle area. Attempts to reach her yesterday were unavailing.


Singleton's sordid trail

-- Sept. 29, 1978 -- Lawrence Singleton kidnaps hitchhiker Mary Vincent, 15,

from Berkeley, drives her to rural Stanislaus County, then rapes her and chops off her forearms with a hatchet.

-- Oct. 9, 1978 -- Singleton is arrested in Sparks, Nev.

-- March 29, 1979 -- Singleton is convicted by a San Diego jury of multiple counts and is sentenced to more than 14 years in prison.

-- April 25, 1987 -- Singleton is paroled from California state prison in San Luis Obispo after serving just over half of his sentence. A furor erupts in Contra Costa County after many towns refuse to allow Singleton to settle there. State officials eventually settle him in a trailer on the grounds of San Quentin State Prison.

-- April 1988 -- Singleton, released from parole, leaves San Quentin, and begins to roam around the East Bay, living part of the time in Richmond.

-- Sept. 14, 1990 -- Singleton, now living in Tampa, Fla., is released from jail after serving 48 days for petty theft.

-- Feb. 19, 1997 -- Roxanne Hayes, a 31-year-old prostitute and mother of three, is stabbed to death in Singleton's Tampa, Fla., home, nine days after Singleton is released from a psychiatric hospital after attempting suicide. A sheriff's deputy, knocking on Singleton's door, finds him in blood-spattered shirt, Hayes' bloody corpse lying on the floor nearby.

-- April 14, 1998 -- Singleton is sentenced to die after a Tampa jury convicts him of first-degree murder in Hayes' death.

-- Dec. 28, 2001 -- Singleton, 74, dies of cancer in a Florida prison hospital.

 


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
15. Tuesday, April 10, 2007 4:44 AM
cybacaT RE: Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


 Member Since
 5/25/2006
 Posts:1216

 View Profile
 Send PM

I see a massive difference between death penalty and physical punishment.

I'm anti-death penalty for a variety of reasons, but pro-physical punishment.

I don't see jail as a reasonable deterrent for many crimes, and admire the Singapore model.  Over there, you can walk the streets day or night and feel perfectly safe.  If someone were to steal our car, or wallet, or mug us, they'd be facing lashings with the rattan cane.

Now I draw the line at physical punishment that would incapacitate or disable a person - amputating hands for stealing etc is barbaric and unproductive.  But a beating is a real deterrent.

A young car thief here thinks - I'll nick a car, go for a spin, take my chances, worst case scenario I get caught and get a warning, or maybe a week in light detention.  Big deal.  In those same shoes, and faced with the prospect of a very painful beating if caught, there's a far greater chance of common sense prevailing, resulting in a choice to not offend.

Like the smacking debate, I fear excesses and emotive imagery is used by opponents to physical punishment, however in the cold light of day it's not a bad proposition, and one that will lead to a reduction in crime.

 
16. Saturday, July 7, 2007 8:19 AM
nuart RE: Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

With a beginning like this....

You can not take one case and apply it to the entire nation, although this goes on all the time. Laws are even made because of single cases! There are over 2 billion people in the United States. I pray for your healing non the less. I also pray for all the Nazi like Americans that take pleasure in other peoples suffering to suffer 100 fold for their cruelty.

...who needs to read on? 2 billion people in the United States??? Look what happens when I go out of town for a few days. The country suddenly has a fertility surge with 1.7 billion new babies? Or were there 1.7 billion new immigrants? Combination of the two? Whaddever, I guess it must be true what's been claimed for a long long time -- the United States is was far from overpopulated. Even with the 2 billion now sharing space in the USA, I haven't noticed any crowding. Seems almost like it did when there were 300,000,000 of us a few days ago.

I haven't read past that point but will try. Without a paragraph break words begin to look like unedited streams of consciousness or worse -- a rant. But perhaps there are gems within those many words and I will seek them out. Perhaps I'll learn something as startling as the current population explosion in my country.

Susan

...I thought the women and "sexual addition" was a typo but then I link to the joedork website and see it there again. Almost verbatim too but with paragraphs. Almost looks like a cut and paste. I'm learning too much too fast but I'm making connections. If there is a female sexual addition there must be a sexual subtraction too. Two million people in prison in Texas? What's the population there -- must be at least a half a billion in which case two million in prison isn't too bad. Hopefully some of those prisoners were actually guilty. Anyway, there's altogether too much math in these posts and links. I'm out.

...just when I thought I was out, they puuuuuuuull me back in.  Statistics and numbers do interest me.  Here's what I found from the Justice Policy Institute website regarding the number of prisoners incarcerated in Texas...


In February 2003, it was reported that the state's prisoner population had reached 147,610 prisoners.

...which could mean that some 850,000 more have gone to Texas prisons since 2003 but it just doesn't make sense. 

 


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
17. Saturday, July 7, 2007 9:23 AM
JVSCant RE: Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:2870

 View Profile
 Send PM

I will say this I am sick of spam.



 

New Topic | Post Reply Page 1 of 1 :: << | 1 | >>
Politics > Death Penalty - California & Florida Style


Users viewing this Topic (1)
1 Guest


This page was generated in 187 ms.