Home | Register | Login | Members  

Current Events > More Violence or More Coverage of Violence?
New Topic | Post Reply
<< | 1 | >>  
1. Friday, May 18, 2007 8:33 PM
nuart More Violence or More Coverage of Violence?


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

I vote for the first option even while the second is also true. But now even in Japan! Something tipped the scales. Probably a lot of things. It took a long time. But here we are.

Civilization is delicate. Maybe... back a few short years ago, we of the industrialized nations had been living through the Best of Times. The best living standards for the greatest number of people ever in the history of the earth. Maybe we were living through a Golden Age but no one recognized it for what it was, given to small complaints which led us to expect ever more. Maybe, back then, that was as good as it ever got. Sigh.

In any event I've got insanity fatique. Japan's outbreak of violent crime is the tip of the iceberg.

Won't someone please join my struggle? I can't be the last sane person. It would just be too lonely.

Or is it possible I'm like that girl Jack Nicholson and Karen Black pick up hitchhiking in Five Easy Pieces. The one who's going to Alaska because it's clean there.

Susan

Outbreak of Violent Crime Unnerves Japan
May 18 02:41 PM US/Eastern
By HANS GREIMEL
Associated Press Writer
TOKYO (AP) - A mother beheaded by her son. A baby who suffocated after being stuffed by his parents in the baggage compartment of a motorbike while they went gambling. A murderous shooting spree during a hostage standoff.

An outbreak of violent crime this week has triggered soul-searching and outrage in Japan, a country that has long prided itself on its safe streets and tight communal bonds.

The "appalling destruction" of traditional values—as one lawmaker put it—climaxed Friday, when a former gangster killed a policeman and wounded his son and daughter during a shooting rampage at his home, where he had held his ex-wife hostage for 24 hours. It was the first time an on-duty policeman was shot to death since 2001.

The standoff capped a week of mayhem and mistreatment.

On Tuesday, a teenager strolled into a police station with his mother's severed head in a bag. On Thursday, a couple was arrested after their 1-year-old son's body was found wrapped in a plastic bag and dumped in a gutter. The baby died after his parents allegedly left him in the baggage hold of a motorbike while they gambled at a pachinko pinball parlor.

The same day, a 3-year-old child was abandoned by his father at an anonymous drop box meant for unwanted infants.

"We are witnessing the deterioration of Japanese society," ruling party politician Tsuneo Suzuki told parliament Thursday. "We must stem this appalling destruction of family and community morals."

While Japan is still a relatively safe country by international standards, crime is on the rise as the country grapples with a widening gap between rich and poor and other social ills.

A tide of corporate layoffs amid widespread restructuring, the fragmentation of extended families and a creeping sense of urban alienation all contribute to the erosion of mores, experts say.

Japan, a country of 127 million people, had just 1,391 homicides in compared with 16,692 in the United States. But overall crime jumped to 2.27 million cases that year, from 1.81 million in 1996, and violent offenses nearly doubled to 73,772 cases, according to the National Police Agency.

"Anxiety is mounting in Japan about the increase of high-profile crimes. Due to rapid globalization, the traditional rules and social order are changing dramatically," said Jun Ayukawa, an expert on criminal psychology at Japan's Kwansei Gakuin University.

"While families used to act as brakes, there is an increase in crimes where people feel lost in despair and no longer care what happens to their families," he said.

Indeed, fractured families have figured prominently in this week's grisly headlines.

Motoki Tamiya and his wife, Mika, both 21, were arrested Thursday after DNA tests of the dead 1-year-old linked the boy to his mother. The baby's body was found last month on a remote road in the mountains of western Japan.

On Tuesday, Japan's only anonymous drop box for unwanted infants triggered a wave of anger after it was discovered that a 3-year-old preschooler—and not a newborn—was left by his father on the service's first day.

The drop-off, known as "Stork's Cradle," was begun by a Roman Catholic-run hospital in southern Japan to stem a wave of abandonments of newborns in unsafe public places.

The same day, there were more shocking headlines. A teenage boy carrying a severed head walked into a Japanese police station saying he killed his mother—the latest in a series of dismemberments.

News reports said the 17-year-old suspect hacked off his mother's head as she slept, then went to an Internet cafe to watch music videos—with the head—before turning himself into police in the morning.

In January, Tokyo was on edge after a woman confessed to cutting up her husband with a saw and dumping the body parts around the capital.

The recent surge in high-profile violent crime has spurred debate over tougher gun control rules, calls for strengthening the moral fiber of younger generations at the nation's schools as well as recriminations about the state of modern parenting.

Calls for more stringent gun control intensified last month when the Nagasaki mayor was shot and killed by an organized crime boss. Days later, police stormed an apartment and seized another gangster who allegedly gunned down a rival outside a Tokyo convenience store and had barricaded himself inside.

The use of guns is still relatively alien to the Japanese public. Handguns are strictly banned, and only police officers and other professionals, such as shooting instructors, are permitted to own them.

Friday's standoff ended when the gunman, Hisato Obayashi, 50, surrendered to police 24 hours after taking his ex-wife captive. The woman, identified as Michiko Mori, escaped from a bathroom window during the siege.

The violence erupted Thursday outside the central city of Nagoya when the suspect shot his adult son and daughter and killed a policeman trying to rescue a wounded comrade. News reports said Obayashi was a former mobster affiliated with Japan's largest crime syndicate, the Yamaguchi-gumi.

 


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
2. Saturday, May 19, 2007 7:35 AM
Raymond RE: More Violence or More Coverage of Violence?


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:1664

 View Profile
 Send PM

Well, there is so much doom, climate problems both real and hysterical, asteroid hits earth, Argamemnon (sp) talk,

bird flu virus obliteration, nuclear mistake, worldwide economic collapse etc. that it seems we are all done for. Time will tell of course, hopefully a more positive period will emerge.

 
3. Saturday, May 19, 2007 11:18 AM
herofix RE: More Violence or More Coverage of Violence?


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:2500

 View Profile
 Send PM

The end is nigh.

 Things we could try...

1) Crushing rampant capitalism globally, including a massive redistribution of wealth and giving ownership of the means of production to workers.

2) Replacing religion globally with a secular humanism complete with a strong moral, ethical and philosophical framework based on the best that traditional religion offers.

3) Making sure that absolutely everybody is armed.  I've been pondering this last one, and it could work. It's also by far the most likely.

 


An Inverted Pyramid of Piffle
 
4. Friday, May 25, 2007 8:49 PM
Raymond RE: More Violence or More Coverage of Violence?


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:1664

 View Profile
 Send PM

Hero,

1) nah, I don't like that idea. So I don't have to write a check to a homeless person for 70% of my net worth. Worse than that it would filter thru a bunch of bureaucrats and next to nothing would reach the homeless cat anyway.

2) I think that is already the way it is- secular governments, with work to do in actually being more 'moral'. Religion outlawed? Well, that kills freedom of choice for Wiccans and Buddists.

3) Fine, except I wouldn't REQUIRE everyone to do it. Freedom of choice my man.

Hero, I thought you were a socialist, number 1( and 2) sounds communist to me ? Hero the Red ?

Bullocks I say   ( Now i will google "bullocks" and see what it means. ) I also think friend Hero was hoping for a response to his post -that rascal.

 
5. Saturday, May 26, 2007 4:03 PM
herofix RE: More Violence or More Coverage of Violence?


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:2500

 View Profile
 Send PM

I'm not necessarily advocating any of those positions, Raymond, just throwing 'em into the mix.

To tell you the truth, I'm as confused as anybody on the definitions of socialism, communism, etc.  I know that the people who argue the most vociferously about what those terms really mean are those on the hard-left themselves!

I guess if you're a proper Marxist, then you should advocate that the workers revolt and take wealth from the owners through violent force (or the threat of violent force).  If you're just a socialist, you would encourage people to democratically elect a representative government which would nationalise large industry on behalf of the people?  Those are just guesses.....please don't quote me on that.

On the other hand entirely, over the past 3-4 years my libertarian position on many social issues has gotten stronger and stronger....go figure.  Over the past few years I've gone on record as opposed to ID cards, fox-hunting bans, smoking bans, and a raft of other legislation.  So yes, I'm confused politically.  I guess I favour a strong government to balance out the excess inequalities that can and will happen under unfettered capitalism, but a very hands-off approach on 'social' issues.  I guess.

But just to make sure I'm clear...I heartily support the right of people to choose and practice a religion, so long as no part of practicing that religion violates the inalienable rights of anyone else.  Christians, Buddhists, Jews, Wiccans, Moslems, Hindus, Sikhs, and um...Bahaii'ers? wouldn't have anything to worry about if I was king of the world (though for some prejudicial reason, I still reserve the right to snigger at Wiccans derisively). 

Sorry Susan for derailing your topic, hehe.

Oh, and I think you might be thinking of 'bollocks' Ray.  (Basically means testicles in the literal sense.)


An Inverted Pyramid of Piffle
 
6. Saturday, May 26, 2007 5:28 PM
Raymond RE: More Violence or More Coverage of Violence?


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:1664

 View Profile
 Send PM
Yes Hero, I looked up 'bollocks'.      We both have in common libertarian streaks. Anyway, you're a good guy at the end of the day. Log Weasel took the time to explain the Scottish situation to me which I appreciated. Therefor, you guys have a great weekend. I insist. Cheers.

 

New Topic | Post Reply Page 1 of 1 :: << | 1 | >>
Current Events > More Violence or More Coverage of Violence?


Users viewing this Topic (0)


This page was generated in 156 ms.