The thread about Ed wanting to kill Nadine made me think of something we've talked sometimes, at least we've discussed a lot of specific cases, like the ones I mention in that thread... I'm talking about the subtext, what we're not told and we must figure out, what some details, gestures, pieces of dialogue tell us about the hidden feelings and behaviors of the characters or even more global things about the plot... All this, of course, with no way to prove if we're right or wrong, because it's all based in what you believe lies beyond the characters and storylines, not having any evidence... And it doesn't matter if the writers thought about it or not, it's the kind of thing that goes beyond the borders of the script and what we see on-screen... I think BOB1 (where is he, BTW?) called it once "metaphysical".
I mentioned some examples in the Big Ed thread, but here I want to talk about 2 cases, more interesting and intriguing IMO. First is the theory about how much was Leland to blame about what happened to Laura... In one side we have the loving innocent father possessed by an evil entity, BOB, guilty of everything and in the other Leland being the incestuous, vicious daddy and BOB the representation of the "evil that men do". I've always defended Leland, who is I believe the greater victim in, as Judge Sternwood put it, that enduring drama... I have no reasons to not believe what he says in ep.16 just before dying and BTW, is in that moment when we can say for the first time in the series and film that we see Leland being 100 % Leland. One of the problems of wanting to blame Leland is that we must consider that BOB is there, so we're never sure which actions are Leland's or BOB's... On the other hand someone mentioned once that the desire for Laura was Leland's, but that it was hidden in a subconscious level and that what BOB did was to awake it, to "feed" on that... And I don't dislike that idea... Conclusion, deciding if Leland is guilty or not depends on the subtext, how possession works, when BOB is there, what are Leland's true feelings for Laura, etc.
I made a thread once about the other case, but I don't remember if the theory was well received or not...
I still agree with myself, but of course as you'll see I have no evidence... Simply put it I believe that Ben's sexual ideal is Audrey... Don't get me wrong, Ben has no incestuous desires for his daughter, what I mean is that if Audrey wasn't his daughter I see Ben falling madly in love with her, or at least desiring her sexually... I base this thought in many little things, but the most important one was the character of Louise Dombrowski; we don't know who she is, a cousin, a baby sitter, but I see clear sexual undertones in that scene with her and the Horne Bros. (call me dirty). The striking similarity between Louise and Audrey made me think in that; but as I say it's just an impression, something that I think is in the subtext, like if Ben dressed his daughter unconsciously like the girl that "made him a man", or that he fell in love with Sylvia because she looked like Louise and that's why Audrey looks like her... I don't know... There are other details, we know Ben feels lust for Audrey's body in OEJ and in the Bookhouse scene he touches her shoulder and removes his hand feeling a little embarrassed. Why? Probably because he suspects she has seen something connected to him in OEJ, but yet again call me dirty I see more in that scene... That kind of things disturb me...
Well, I think I've written enought, I'll try to think in more examples and I'd love to read others... Now if you excuse me I really have to ur...I mean, I've just found a TP board in spanish and I still can't believe it, I'm going to check it out... This place is still (and will always be) the best though....


