Home | Register | Login | Members  

Politics > Dueling Speeches Today
New Topic | Post Reply
<< | 1 | >>  
1. Thursday, May 21, 2009 5:30 PM
nuart Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

First Obama ; then Cheney. You can read them here.

I was stunned by Obama's tone -- angry, defensive, hostile and accusatory.  And very looooong too.  I think he is understanding in a gradual sense what it means to put into practice all those theories only talked about in universities and legislative chambers.

Cheney = most perfect rebuttal though it was not intended as such per se.  His speech was planned before Obama's press conference today.  Say what you will about Dick Cheney, I thought he made mincemeat of Obama's arguments.

Anybody else hear them both?  Jordan???

 

Susan


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
2. Friday, May 22, 2009 11:50 AM
bio_hazard RE: Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 7/7/2008
 Posts:385

 View Profile
 Send PM

I'll give you that Cheney's speech was well written.  I'm not sure what it says that he now appears to be one of the most persuasive spokespeople for issues championed by the GOP. While it is probably beneficial for everyone that there are people on the right doing more than attempting to rename the democratic party, this may not bode well for the GOP.

It was ENTIRELY intended as a direct rebuttal, however. (Obama released the text of his speech before it was given, and Cheney's audience at the American Enterprise institute watched Obama's speech on a big screen immediately before.  The talking points on both sides are already well aired).

I think the only real question Cheney raised in my mind is about the information we actually gained specifically from waterboarding, as opposed to other methods from those suspects or from other suspects.  Obviously I don't know what is being withheld, but it does seem odd that it can't be released with some of the rest of the info.

Additionally, the point that it was used only on three high-value targets probably deserves to be re-iterated more.

I also did laugh at this quote:

[I might add that people who consistently distort the truth in this way are in no position to lecture anyone about “values.”]

pot, kettle?

National Security is a high stakes endeavor that is not easy.  I still find the contempt and dismissal of "winning hearts and minds"  pretty naive as part of an overall strategy. 

 
3. Friday, May 22, 2009 3:08 PM
jordan RE: Dueling Speeches Today

 Admin
 Member Since
 12/17/2005
 Posts:2274

 View Profile
 Send PM
did not get a chance to hear it but the soundbites i heard were really good and concise from Cheney. From what I heard, it did sound like Cheney made mincemeat of the Obama arguments fairly easily. WHERE WAS THIS DISCUSSION YEARS AGO??!?! or at least during the election?


Jordan .

 
4. Friday, May 22, 2009 3:49 PM
bio_hazard RE: Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 7/7/2008
 Posts:385

 View Profile
 Send PM

Really?  i feel like we've been talking about this issue for years.  Ever since the dems took back congress there has been open conflict between bush adm and congress over this issue.   Definitely since before the election- and certainly Guantanamo was one of Obama's platforms.

 And I think mincemeat is in the eye of the beholder ;)

 
5. Friday, May 22, 2009 4:27 PM
nuart RE: Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

The outrage over "torture" has seemed to me as so... so... hard to fathom, I suppose.  When having this discussion here once before I think we all came to the conclusion that whatever the actual policy, if the circumstances evolved to a situation where there really was a 'ticking bomb' the policy would have to go the Jack Bauer way with a handful of people ever knowing what happened.

My brother who was in the Air Force during Vietnam has been visiting.  He told us all about his survival training and laughs at the so-called torture of terror suspects delineated in the memos.  Their training was based on the actual prisoner abuse going on in North Vietnam at the time and was seriously brutal.  Only the strong survive type of thing. 

So the idea that this is a major deal for some seems to me more of a disdain toward Bush than the actual policies.  

When I listened to Obama I wondered what he has had to say about his idol, Abe Lincoln, and the treatment of Confederate soldiers, the suspension of habeas corpus and some of the other 'transgressions' of the Civil War. 

I'm just glad to have had the two sets of views presented in close proximity as they were.  If Cheney meant his speech as a response, that's fine with me too.  I didn't know that was so but I guess you're right that both sides know one another's points pretty well by now.

Susan


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
6. Friday, May 22, 2009 8:02 PM
jordan RE: Dueling Speeches Today

 Admin
 Member Since
 12/17/2005
 Posts:2274

 View Profile
 Send PM
I guess technically we have been talking about it for years, but there seems to be a shift in the discussion somewhat that is refreshing. Maybe it's because Cheney (and former Bush admins) can actually come out and speak about things without worrying about the political repurcissions (if that makes sense). With Obama's recent back-peadalling and the revolt in the Congress from funding Gitmo closing, Obama is quickly learning it's easy to talk, and a lot harder to DO something. Things ain't black and white Wait , where have I heard that before?


Jordan .

 
7. Friday, May 22, 2009 9:04 PM
Nefud RE: Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 8/2/2007
 Posts:1793

 View Profile
 Send PM

yep, defense of torture is going on in this thread just wanted to check in and confirm it. have fun, i'm never looking in here again

 
8. Saturday, May 23, 2009 5:59 AM
jordan RE: Dueling Speeches Today

 Admin
 Member Since
 12/17/2005
 Posts:2274

 View Profile
 Send PM
Because it's just that simple, huh?


Jordan .

 
9. Saturday, May 23, 2009 7:12 AM
bio_hazard RE: Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 7/7/2008
 Posts:385

 View Profile
 Send PM
I'll be interested to see what Tom Ridge says- I saw a teaser that he was going to hit some of the weekend political shows and take both Cheney and Obama to task on this.

 
10. Saturday, May 23, 2009 7:46 AM
nuart RE: Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

QUOTE:

yep, defense of torture is going on in this thread just wanted to check in and confirm it. have fun, i'm never looking in here again


I'm willing to wager this statement is false.  Any takers? 

Susan

PS  Gitmo has served as a model prison.  I like the location too.  




     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
11. Saturday, May 23, 2009 12:46 PM
jordan RE: Dueling Speeches Today

 Admin
 Member Since
 12/17/2005
 Posts:2274

 View Profile
 Send PM
I LOVE the location. You know one of the suggestions for sending the Gitmo prisoners was to Leavenworth which is about 15 miles from where we live. I believe KS was one of the states that passed a bill to not allow Gitmo prisoners into the state.


Jordan .

 
12. Saturday, May 23, 2009 3:06 PM
one suave folk RE: Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 12/21/2005
 Posts:5862

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:did not get a chance to hear it but the soundbites i heard were really good and concise from Cheney. From what I heard, it did sound like Cheney made mincemeat of the Obama arguments fairly easily. WHERE WAS THIS DISCUSSION YEARS AGO??!?! or at least during the election?
Mmm, mincemeat.  Contains neither mints, nor meat. The pie filling that's so delicious, yet so enigmatic. I think Obama AND Cheney would agree with that!!!
 

 
13. Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:31 AM
nuart RE: Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

Biohazard wrote re/Cheney's speech:

 It was ENTIRELY intended as a direct rebuttal, however. (Obama released the text of his speech before it was given, and Cheney's audience at the American Enterprise institute watched Obama's speech on a big screen immediately before.  The talking points on both sides are already well aired).

I took this as factual.  But then I was reading two separate articles that would reverse the direct rebuttal claim.  It appears it was Obama's direct rebuttal to Cheney.

From the Main Street column (WSJ) by William McGurn:

Back in those heady days after the 2008 election, anyone who suggested that Mr. Obama might find himself playing defense to Dick Cheney on Guantanamo would have been hauled off as barking mad.  Yet that' exactly what Mr. Cheney has pulled off, leaving a desperate White House to try to drown him out by adding an Obama speech the same day Mr. Cheney was slated to address the American Enterprise Institute.

 From US News section in the WSJ:

Mr. Obama scheduled his speech late last week, after Mr. Cheney's speech already had been publicly scheduled.  White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the timing 'wasn't based on the fact that anybody else was speaking.'  Mr. Cheney delayed the scheduled beginning of his remarks by half an hour to wait for Mr. Obama to finish.

 

What I do agree with is that both men had made their views pretty clear in the days leading up to these speeches.  But what appears to be maybe a first in the Obama presidency is the prickliness in allowing a rival to get under his skin.  Even Robert Gibbs referencing Dick Cheney as "anybody else" is intentionally dismissive.

Having read a lot more on these polarizing sets of views, I still think it has been a worthwhile discussion whether there is a live Republican politician other than Cheney willing to speak out clearly on the issues he knows so much about.

One other fun Opinion piece from Bret Stephens .  Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 strategies taken from South Park Gnomes.

 

Susan


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
14. Thursday, May 28, 2009 11:20 AM
jordan RE: Dueling Speeches Today

 Admin
 Member Since
 12/17/2005
 Posts:2274

 View Profile
 Send PM
there's no doubt in my mind that Obama's speech was intended to be a rebuttal of Cheney since Cheney was scheduled far in advance. They didn't want Cheney to take all the news that day.


Jordan .

 
15. Thursday, May 28, 2009 4:31 PM
coolspringsj RE: Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 8/8/2007
 Posts:3412

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

yep, defense of torture is going on in this thread just wanted to check in and confirm it. have fun, i'm never looking in here again


 Sprout a backbone or I'll waterboard your candy ass


"Harry, I'm going to let you in on a little secret. Every day, once a day, give yourself a present. Don't plan it, don't wait for it, just let it happen. Could be a new shirt at the men's store, a catnap in your office chair, or two cups of good, hot, black coffee. Like this."  -Dale Cooper

 
16. Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:06 PM
bio_hazard RE: Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 7/7/2008
 Posts:385

 View Profile
 Send PM
Thanks Susan and Jordan- did not realize the timing issue there...  Very few people probably watched either speech live. 

 
17. Friday, May 29, 2009 10:14 AM
WilliamTheBloody RE: Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 3/12/2009
 Posts:647

 View Profile
 Send PM
Ladies and gentlemen, I present this.


"What? Did your life pass before your eyes? Cuppa tea, cuppa tea, almost got shagged, cuppa tea..."

 
18. Monday, June 1, 2009 9:23 AM
coolspringsj RE: Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 8/8/2007
 Posts:3412

 View Profile
 Send PM
Why would anyone give a rat's ass about the rights of a prisoner who believes we are infidels and should die because we are not part of their religion.  If the technique is gathering valuable intel to save American lives, F 'em.


"Harry, I'm going to let you in on a little secret. Every day, once a day, give yourself a present. Don't plan it, don't wait for it, just let it happen. Could be a new shirt at the men's store, a catnap in your office chair, or two cups of good, hot, black coffee. Like this."  -Dale Cooper

 
19. Tuesday, June 2, 2009 8:47 AM
nuart RE: Dueling Speeches Today


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:Why would anyone give a rat's ass about the rights of a prisoner who believes we are infidels and should die because we are not part of their religion.  If the technique is gathering valuable intel to save American lives, F 'em...


 ...if they can't take a joke.

Geez, they don't even like cartoons for cryin' out loud.

 

Susan


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 

New Topic | Post Reply Page 1 of 1 :: << | 1 | >>
Politics > Dueling Speeches Today


Users viewing this Topic (0)


This page was generated in 140 ms.