Home | Register | Login | Members  

Movies, TV, Music & Games > Last movie, a little more in-depth
New Topic | Post Reply
<< | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | >>  
526. Wednesday, March 21, 2007 1:28 PM
Booth RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 8/20/2006
 Posts:4388

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

I looked forward to the movie, but with reservations because of the short bit-to-feature comedy killing syndrome. Sure enough -- a flop with a few isolated moments of hilarity.


Since Bean was influenced by M. Hulot I will once again recommend the films of my favorite Frenchman - Jacques Tati.
Les Vacances de Monsieur Hulot (Mr Hulot's Holiday*) is the one that will fit most in the "comedy" mold, but the real brilliance is in Mon Oncle and Playtime.

None of them are gut bustingly funny though.

*The next Bean movie is called Mr. Bean's Holiday and takes place in France.

 
527. Wednesday, March 21, 2007 5:03 PM
cybacaT RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 5/25/2006
 Posts:1216

 View Profile
 Send PM

Well Susan I think we mostly agree then...especially when it comes to Team America - that was just *Gold*.

Best moment for me would be between the "I'm sow wownwee" song of lament from Jung-Il, and the "Screen Actors Guild Medley" near the end.  Clever stuff.

 
528. Wednesday, March 21, 2007 5:26 PM
LogicHat RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:2335

 View Profile
 Send PM

^^^
That's "the Film Actors Guild" . I didn't think the movie was that funny, especially compared to South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut. Though I'd wager a guess that it was probably funnier than Orgazmo and BASEketball.

But I own the Team America soundtrack, and it is gold.


Logic Hat Online- logichat.org


 
529. Wednesday, March 21, 2007 8:59 PM
nuart RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

Okay, Booth, I'm going to take your advice and give your Frenchman a try. Which of these two would you recommend for my next Netflix pick. (As soon as I'm finished with Born Into Brothels) I'm leaning toward the chucklehead with neoteric (???) gadgetry. Did you write this synopsis, Booth?

Mon Uncle: (1957) Jacques Tati plays Monsieur Hulot, a self-absorbed chucklehead wrestling with neoteric gadgetry -- and losing -- in this satirical masterpiece that makes sport of mechanization, class distinctions and modernity. While visiting his sister's surreal, ultra-trendy home, Hulot finds himself incessantly at odds with newfangled contraptions that get the better of him. The tongue-in-cheek French comedy garnered a Best Foreign Language Film Oscar.

Playtime: (1967) The celebrated Jacques Tati directs and stars in this brilliantly eccentric ode to humanity. Tati plays Monsieur Hulot, a Parisian who's befuddled by the changes he witnesses in his beloved city, which has grown increasingly touristy. As Hulot roams the uncomfortably modern Paris with a group of American tourists, his story epitomizes the struggle of modern man to maintain a soul in the face of an impersonal world.

 

Susan


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
530. Thursday, March 22, 2007 12:23 AM
cybacaT RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 5/25/2006
 Posts:1216

 View Profile
 Send PM

 

Damn - it lost half the humour in my mistranslation... 

Haven't seen the SouthPark flick, so can't compare really.  I've never watched a whole episode, and the show hasn't really grabbed me.

 
531. Thursday, March 22, 2007 8:03 AM
Booth RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 8/20/2006
 Posts:4388

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

Okay, Booth, I'm going to take your advice and give your Frenchman a try. Which of these two would you recommend for my next Netflix pick.


Short answer: Mon Oncle.

Slightly longer answer: I recommend starting with Les Vacances... only because it would work as a gateway drug. It's light and easy, and gets you in the right mindset for the others. But it's not as good, so I'll only say start with that if I know that the person is going to see the other movies.

As Mr. Bean was influenced by Hulot, Hulot himself was influenced by the silent comedians, most notably Buster Keaton. Even though there is dialogue, the movies could be considered silent, relying mostly on visuals.

And that Mon Oncle synopsis almost made it sound like the whole movie is about Hulot and his sister's "crazy high-tech house". It's not. For that sort of thing, it's better to watch Keaton's The Electric House, or Chaplin's Modern Times.

So start with Mon Oncle, and if you like it, try Playtime.

Just don't watch it with a "ok movie, make me laugh" attitude, and you'll be fine.

 
532. Thursday, March 22, 2007 11:30 AM
nuart RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

Well, I've got the first two at the top of my queue, Booth.  But "light" is not a description that usually induces me to see a film.  Neither is "cute." 

But I trust you, so I'm trying them both in chronological order.   I do one Netflix a week so this weekend we've got Born Into Brothels and then next weekend -- Les Vacances.

Expect a fair and balanced, a little more in-depth, review soon after! 

Susan 


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
533. Thursday, March 22, 2007 11:38 AM
Booth RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 8/20/2006
 Posts:4388

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

Well, I've got the first two at the top of my queue, Booth. But "light" is not a description that usually induces me to see a film. Neither is "cute."

In this case I meant light as in a light breeze on a nice summer's day. Not the other kind of light.
But I do hope you like them both.

 
534. Thursday, March 22, 2007 1:20 PM
Flangella RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:1646

 View Profile
 Send PM

Vanity Fair, with Reese Witherspoon.  I had actually forgotten it was on my rental list, but thought I would give it a try.  I wanted to like it, but it was all over the place.  Even at over two hours long it was flicking backwards and forwards between plot threads and of course changed the ending to suit the film. 

 
I'm sorry but I just don't get why anyone would make a film based on a classic novel and change it to suit.  Either you like the ending or you don't, so if you don't leave the damn thing alone!  They did this with Pride and Prejudice as well (Keira Knightley version) and I hated that too...

...grrrr... 


My theory by A. Elk, brackets, Miss, brackets. This theory goes as follows and begins now. All brontosauruses are thin at one end, much much thicker in the middle, and then thin again at the far end. That is my theory, it is mine, and it belongs to me, and I own it, and what it is, too.

Ange's Odyssey


 
535. Friday, March 23, 2007 12:38 PM
Outlaw2x4 RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/20/2005
 Posts:1627

 View Profile
 Send PM

300

 

A more kick ass movie has never been made. Its funny that all the criticisms for it are the exact reasons I think makes it so class. 


If we nail this bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a pack of cards...Checkmate! - Zap Brannigan
 
536. Friday, March 23, 2007 2:55 PM
BOB1 RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/25/2005
 Posts:2908

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

I'm sorry but I just don't get why anyone would make a film based on a classic novel and change it to suit.  Either you like the ending or you don't, so if you don't leave the damn thing alone!

I see your point but then think of Wild at Heart for example... change the ending and you get a film better than the book (which is good in itself).

And even if not better for someone, then definitely the Lynch ending casts a wholly different light on the story and presents quite a different view of the world.
 


Bobi 1 Kenobi

B. Beware
O. Of
B. BOB
 

 
537. Saturday, March 24, 2007 6:43 AM
mr. silencio RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/20/2005
 Posts:1466

 View Profile
 Send PM

It's been a long time since I haven't seen an american movie. I think that's a good thing, because lately most of them are terrible.

300, for example, could have been a better movie if it was less action-packed and with those alienating heavy metal music pieces during the battles. I mean, it's Sparta vs the Persians. Not Matrix. Anyway, I didn't see the movie, only excerpts there and there on the internet and on Tv, some friend told me it was amazingly done if you consider only the technical aspects. But it's not the only thing I look for in a film. I think a good contemporary film on Sparta is yet to be made. Or maybe I'm just not really into epic movies.

Anyway, the only one I liked more of this genre was Stone's Alexander, and I read that in the U.S. the final director's cut  is coming out with a whole part that was cut out, depicting the homosexual relationship between him and a friend I don't remember the name. I'm curious to take a look at the film as Stone intended it to be.

I still haven't seen Wolrd Trade center but I read and heard it's nothing revolutionary or that very much interesting. 

I'm curious about Letters from Iwo Jima, The Hottest state, Bobby, Hollywoodland and Borat (but I wanna wait the dvd 'cause I'd like to watch it only in English, apparently the italian dubbed version is terrible).

I totally abandoned my enthusiasm about The Fountain as soon as I watched the theatrical trailer.

The last English-spoken movie that really left me satisfied, of course after IE, was NOTES ON A SCANDAL.


"Did they scoff the whole damn Smörgåsbord?" (Audrey) 

"Gimme a donut!" (Coop)

 
538. Saturday, March 24, 2007 9:19 AM
one suave folk RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/21/2005
 Posts:5862

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:
QUOTE:NOW FINALLY available on DVD--- Performance , the 1970 first film from Nicholas Roeg, starring James Fox, Mick Jagger & Anita Pallenberg (who's also interviewed). A truly trippy & unique look at what happens when a London gangster on the run hides out in the home of a reclusive rock star. Also the first film score by Jack Nitzsche, with debut soundtrack contributions from Ry Cooder & Randy Newman. The bonus material is aces too.

Ewwwweeeee, I loved this film which I saw for the first time in a double feature with The Devils in the summer of 1971.  

But I must correct you, Chris, it is not really a Nicholas Roeg film.  It's really a Donald Cammel-Nicholas Roeg film and it's scandalous that you would omit Cammel from your credits!  I'm shocked!  Donald Cammel would be shocked as well had he not commited suicide about a dozen years ago.  

Great film! 

Susan 

  Mea culpa, Susie Q!  I know it was a collab, but figured more folk would be familiar with Mr. Roeg, & those with class would investigate & discover the truth.   Fun fact, in the early days of developing Clockwork Orange  for the screen, The Rolling Stones were considered for the Droogs! Can't imagine anyone but Malcolm as Alex, but it sure would've been interesting to see Mick in the role.  Hey, Performance & A.C.O. come out the same year!!
 

 
539. Sunday, March 25, 2007 7:44 AM
Outlaw2x4 RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/20/2005
 Posts:1627

 View Profile
 Send PM

QUOTE:

It's been a long time since I haven't seen an american movie. I think that's a good thing, because lately most of them are terrible.

300, for example, could have been a better movie if it was less action-packed and with those alienating heavy metal music pieces during the battles. I mean, it's Sparta vs the Persians. Not Matrix. Anyway, I didn't see the movie, only excerpts there and there on the internet and on Tv, some friend told me it was amazingly done if you consider only the technical aspects. But it's not the only thing I look for in a film. I think a good contemporary film on Sparta is yet to be made. Or maybe I'm just not really into epic movies.

Anyway, the only one I liked more of this genre was Stone's Alexander, and I read that in the U.S. the final director's cut is coming out with a whole part that was cut out, depicting the homosexual relationship between him and a friend I don't remember the name. I'm curious to take a look at the film as Stone intended it to be.

I still haven't seen Wolrd Trade center but I read and heard it's nothing revolutionary or that very much interesting.

I'm curious about Letters from Iwo Jima, The Hottest state, Bobby, Hollywoodland and Borat (but I wanna wait the dvd 'cause I'd like to watch it only in English, apparently the italian dubbed version is terrible).

I totally abandoned my enthusiasm about The Fountain as soon as I watched the theatrical trailer.

The last English-spoken movie that really left me satisfied, of course after IE, was NOTES ON A SCANDAL.

That is such bullshit. You havent even watched 300, I cant stand when people do that. Express an opinion on a movie they havent even seen. If you watched it and said the same thing I would have understood, but you havent seen it, so shut up.



If we nail this bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a pack of cards...Checkmate! - Zap Brannigan
 
540. Sunday, March 25, 2007 1:48 PM
Booth RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 8/20/2006
 Posts:4388

 View Profile
 Send PM
Red Eye

A thriller with 55 minutes of setup/exposition, and 20 minutes of thrilling. That's not very good, but I will say that when the thrills eventually came, they were rather good.
Overall a pretty forgettable movie.

There was a little vomit, or at least a dry heave.

 
541. Monday, March 26, 2007 12:07 PM
Booth RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 8/20/2006
 Posts:4388

 View Profile
 Send PM

Borat

This had some funny moments, but it has nothing on the short clips from Ali G.
I found the bits about the Jews funny, the running of the Jew, and the "they've changed shapes" bit in the B&B.
The giggling weatherman was funny and that's about it. Oh, and the village person that gets the rubber fist as a new arm.

The uncomfortable comedy worked better in the show, and the nude fight was just boring gross-out. How fat was that guy?

 
542. Monday, March 26, 2007 7:24 PM
Booth RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 8/20/2006
 Posts:4388

 View Profile
 Send PM
Rabid

The c*cksucker with the sucker c*ck.

It has a cheap look to it, which is something that is typical of Cronenberg; aiming for the moon but only having the money for some bottle rockets. The brutalist architecture is there, like in most Conenberg movies that take place in some kind of "institution", I liked the hallways, but the rooms were horrible looking.

I am fairly sure Cronenberg himself dubbed Robert Silverman.
I found the use of the name Keloid (look it up if you don't know what it is) for the head doctors to be really quite silly.
A pretty decent pre-Videodrome movie.

 
543. Tuesday, March 27, 2007 5:53 AM
smokedchezpig RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:5246

 View Profile
 Send PM
Heathers - I don't think I need to say  anything about this one do I other than it's of the best dark comedies of the last 30 years hands down.... 


"Every day holds a new beginning and every hour holds the promise of an Invitation to Love." 

 
544. Tuesday, March 27, 2007 9:32 AM
nuart RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

Booth, what can I say?  ...up to your Borat review.  I'm feeling a gust of confidence that I'm going to enjoy my mini-Jacques Tati fest! 

Whenever I think of the medical term "keloid" I think of OJ Simpson's old football injuries. 

Susan 

 


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
545. Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:26 PM
Booth RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 8/20/2006
 Posts:4388

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

Whenever I think of the medical term "keloid" I think of OJ Simpson's old football injuries.

Whenever I think of kool-aid injuries, I think of Jim Jones.

QUOTE:

I'm feeling a gust of confidence that I'm going to enjoy my mini-Jacques Tati fest!


I think you will. There's no vomit.

 
546. Thursday, March 29, 2007 5:58 AM
LogicHat RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:2335

 View Profile
 Send PM

The Big Lebowski

So I finally sit down and watch this, uncensored and uncut for the first time, and... I wasn't disappointed.*

It's still second to Barton Fink as my favorite Coen Bros. flick (sorry, Booth), but there's a lot more to entertain here. The plot is convoluted, but that's not the point, the real interest is in seeing how the Dude reacts to each new link in the chain. The movie is very quotable, but I think, for the sake of the Internet, we should maybe cut down on the references a bit. But, you know, that's just, uh, my opinion, man.

Also- I'm not sure why the "What Condition My Condition Was In" musical number makes me so happy, but I think it has something to do with Jeff's dance moves. Not to mention the wide-eyed look of joy he sports throughout.

*Well, I was a little disappointed over the abscense of the stranger in the Alps. They should edit that into the original cut. 


Logic Hat Online- logichat.org


 
547. Thursday, March 29, 2007 4:55 PM
goodmorningamerica RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 1/16/2006
 Posts:229

 View Profile
 Send PM
agree with previous posts on Rabid- something strangley good about that movie, and heathers - absolutely fantastic movie. saw Zodiac, was very good too. Robert Downey JR is fab, well shot, very frightnening movie.A all the way


Bleep you, & bleep the establishment, and bleep all of you who are trying to make me part of the unestablished establishment.

 
548. Friday, March 30, 2007 2:24 PM
Booth RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 8/20/2006
 Posts:4388

 View Profile
 Send PM

Idiocracy

The strange thing about this movie isn't that its distribution was mishandled, but that it was made at all.
Starbucks dealing in handjobs? Fuddruckers becoming Buttf*ckers? It boggles the mind.

It wasn't as good as I had hoped, but the satire was biting, and it was a real nice middle finger to many things I hate about contemporary (pop)culture.

Watch it or f*ck off!

 
549. Friday, March 30, 2007 11:00 PM
Flangella RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:1646

 View Profile
 Send PM

300

I thought it was visually stunning, considering the whole thing was shot against blue and green screen.  To be honest I don't think it's fair to compare it against a film such as the Matrix.  Yes, it is the legend of the Spartans vs the Persians, but Frank Miller's version of it inspired by his viewing of The 300 Spartans .

Let's face it, the man has an exceptional imagination anyway, and the film adaptation was bound to be stylised to be as close to the graphic novel as possible.  I didn't find the music intrusive; rather I thought it suited the mood of the film.


My theory by A. Elk, brackets, Miss, brackets. This theory goes as follows and begins now. All brontosauruses are thin at one end, much much thicker in the middle, and then thin again at the far end. That is my theory, it is mine, and it belongs to me, and I own it, and what it is, too.

Ange's Odyssey


 
550. Saturday, March 31, 2007 12:17 PM
Maddy RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth


 Member Since
 12/21/2005
 Posts:3097

 View Profile
 Send PM

QUOTE:

Okay, I'll hold my hand up and admit I actually paid money to see Ghostrider.

In short, this is the worst movie I've seen in a long, long time.

The dialogue, script and acting were all abysmal. Frighteningly bad performances, even from Nic Cage. Surely not the same guy that was in Wild at Heart?

Eva Mendes' gravity defying boobs and the CGI were the only things that mildly sparked my interest.

A total and utter turdfest, folks.

 

wow really? That bad?!  I was actually planning on going to see this because it's like forever since I've seen anything, was looking forward to doing so and am a big Nic fan (even though The Wicker Man re-make especially the ending was also complete tripe), but maybe now I will save my money,  thanks for the heads up Ray.

 

Trying to think what the last film I saw was. I think it was just FWWM or MD actually I watched both recently and have reviewed them to death so I won't bore you to death with another review/synopsis apart to say "they rock". 

 



"watch out for my cousin.."

 

 


 

 

New Topic | Post Reply Page 22 of 63 :: << | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | >>
Movies, TV, Music & Games > Last movie, a little more in-depth


Users viewing this Topic (1)
1 Guest


This page was generated in 1264 ms.