 |
|
|
|
|
| 576. Friday, April 6, 2007 4:27 PM |
| ig0r |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 1/25/2006 Posts:208
View Profile Send PM
|
Jesus Camp Very moving although I am like always completely torn ethically.
|
| 577. Friday, April 6, 2007 9:34 PM |
| one suave folk |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/21/2005 Posts:5862
View Profile Send PM
|
Just dug into the crazy entertaining Grindhouse!! (TP's Michael Parks is in both flicks & Nic Cage is in Rob Zombie's trailer as Fu Manchu). Liked Planet Terror better. Death Proof was way too dialogue heavy & just not prime QT. Still, a solid A. Earlier in the week I saw The Lookout, an understated but effective neo-noir by Scott Frank, starring Joseph Gordon-Levitt (Brick) & Jeff Daniels. Dug it muchly...
|
| 578. Saturday, April 7, 2007 11:39 AM |
| nuart |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/18/2005 Posts:7632
View Profile Send PM
|
QUOTE: Jackass Number Two
More stunt natured and less comedy in this one. Was not as amusing as the first movie or the TV show. The gross out bits had already been done by the Dirty Sanchez guys, except the semen chugging.
|
Alright. Okay. I've already gone past the point of no return. The Netflix envelope is on the coffee table. It's scheduled. Tonight is the night for Mon Oncle and even though the above commentary makes me muy nervosa, I'm going to take them as an anomoly. Or maybe a joke. The same astute critic who has brought me to Jacques Tati cannot possibly be serious about Jackass 1 being more amusing than Jackass 2. That good??? By the way, will there be a trilogy? What the world needs now... One night, oh maybe 5 years ago, we were finishing up dinner at a restaurant in Hollywood when someone at our table said, "Look! There's Johnnie Knoxville." Who??? I asked. I wish that had been the last I heard of him. Susan
“Half a truth is often a great lie.” Ben Franklin
|
| 579. Saturday, April 7, 2007 12:25 PM |
| Booth |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 8/20/2006 Posts:4388
View Profile Send PM
|
I'm not a fan of Jackass, and I do not think it has much of a replay value. I do find some of it funny, and most of that involves Johnny Knoxville.
I think I laughed once during Jackass 2, while I laughed a couple more times during the show and first movie. It's schadenfreude, pure and simple.
|
| 580. Saturday, April 7, 2007 1:39 PM |
| nuart |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/18/2005 Posts:7632
View Profile Send PM
|
schadenfreude Doesn't that belong over in the Word of the Week thread? Susan
“Half a truth is often a great lie.” Ben Franklin
|
| 581. Saturday, April 7, 2007 2:08 PM |
| LogicHat |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/19/2005 Posts:2335
View Profile Send PM
|
Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope I put the whole title in there to distinguish the version I watched from the original theatrical cut. I bought the "limited edition" trilogy with the original cuts included as a bonus. I wish I could say I had had the will power to stick with the original, untampered version, but the call of a anamorphic transfer and a morbid interest in checking out Lucas' added material drew me to this one. I could have done without all the distracting CGI. Jawas flying around Mos Eisley is just silly, and Jabba the Hut should never be anything other than an obese muppet. But the film itself is terrific looking, and the whole thing makes me reflect on how lousy the prequels were all over again. What happened to all the terrific humor Lucas put into this first script?
Logic Hat Online- logichat.org
|
| 582. Saturday, April 7, 2007 5:27 PM |
| B |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/18/2005 Posts:1263
View Profile Send PM
|
Pearl Harbor Strange, there was stuff about a war in this love story for some reason. The Mission If it weren't for the TPG recommendations, I never would have seen this. Wow. Joffe should have won 'Best Director', even though his competition included Lynch that year.
-B
|
| 583. Saturday, April 7, 2007 7:00 PM |
| one suave folk |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/21/2005 Posts:5862
View Profile Send PM
|
| QUOTE: schadenfreude Doesn't that belong over in the Word of the Week thread? Susan | "Word of the DAY", actually. A noble, yet now neglected thread.
|
| 584. Saturday, April 7, 2007 7:00 PM |
| one suave folk |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/21/2005 Posts:5862
View Profile Send PM
|
| QUOTE: schadenfreude Doesn't that belong over in the Word of the Week thread? Susan | "Word of the DAY", actually. A noble, yet now neglected thread.
|
| 585. Sunday, April 8, 2007 6:07 AM |
| smokedchezpig |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/19/2005 Posts:5246
View Profile Send PM
|
I'm glad Susan and I convinced you to check out The Mission, B....
"Every day holds a new beginning and every hour holds the promise of an Invitation to Love."
|
| 586. Sunday, April 8, 2007 11:09 AM |
| Laura was a patient of mine |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 3/15/2006 Posts:690
View Profile Send PM
|
Dancer in the Dark... I saw this because someone here (I think it was nuart) really loved it... Bjork was fantastic as an actress... it was a truly great performance, and she really should've won an Oscar for it. The supporting cast was terriffic as well, particularly Catherine Deneuve. I liked the look of the movie (excluding the musical scenes... I'll get around to them) it was like a documentary, or a home movie or something. It was a very sad and touching film. However the plot was really contrived (*spoilers* I really had a hard time believing the all important murder scene), and the musical scenes... I'm sorry but first off I just don't like Bjork's music very much. It's not really my thing and her voice is just weird... I don't see how she became a professional singer. Her style of music just doesn't work with musical sequences either... tap dancing to Bjork is just weird. I appreciated what Lars von Trier was trying to do with these scenes, but he has no clue how to direct and edit dance scenes. The choreography was lousy, you couldn't see all of the dancer's bodies most of the time, and the cameras constantly cut to bizarre and confusing angles. I wanted to love these scenes, but they didn't work at all. So this wasn't "Pennies From Heaven" (a bleak musical where the fantastic musical sequences are the highlight). One song did work though, but it was the one she sang at the end in real life, and not a fantasy scene. I was very glad I saw it though, and I won't forget the film any time soon. I'd give 3 stars out of 4, most due to an amazing central performance.
That god damn trailer's more popular than Uncle's Day in a whorehouse!
|
| 587. Sunday, April 8, 2007 1:42 PM |
| nuart |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/18/2005 Posts:7632
View Profile Send PM
|
Actually, LWaPoM, I loathed Dancer in the Dark. Or what I was able to watch of it. It was strange how I came to see it. Richard Beymer had been a fan of the Dogme films and very much liked Celebration. He liked the whole concept of working with a small camera, utilizing natural light and the constraints of the Dogme director's credo. Around that time I had read an interview with Lars Von Trier where he discussed Twin Peaks but also West Side Story. Since Richard was a part of both and since he was a Dogme fan, I told Richard to get in touch with Von Trier. I did a little research trying to track down a mailing address for Von Trier and while doing so, happened onto lots of stories on Dancer in the Dark. The wide range of opinions on this film intriqued me. They ran the gamut from love to hate. I enjoyed the discussions and read way past the point I should have so that I knew the whole story in advance of seeing the film. I knew why some loved it and why others hated it and those critiques were enough to perk my interest. Then Richard called to tell me he had watched it. How'd he like it? He said his favorite part was the fast forward button on his VCR remote. Pretty sure it was before a DVD release. I rented it anyway. Rarely have I watched a film I found more off-putting. I really really really hated it. I know Bjork wowed the critics but I found her annoying. That film seemed to have had its birth pangs in some alien universe - a place I never plan to visit. To believe the storyline was too great a leap of logic for me even if I had been amenable to the structure of the film. So, no. I was not the one who loved it. In fact, looking over his IMDB listings, I realize the only thing he's done I've ever liked was the short film describing what makes a Dogme film. However, I'm not even certain he's the one who made that film. Emily Watson was good in Breaking the Waves, though. Lars never wrote back to Richard, btw. Anti-American twerp. Susan
“Half a truth is often a great lie.” Ben Franklin
|
| 588. Sunday, April 8, 2007 1:50 PM |
| Booth |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 8/20/2006 Posts:4388
View Profile Send PM
|
QUOTE:Words not concerning Mon Oncle.
| This is torture.
|
| 589. Sunday, April 8, 2007 3:46 PM |
| nuart |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/18/2005 Posts:7632
View Profile Send PM
|
QUOTE:QUOTE:Words not concerning Mon Oncle.
| This is torture. |
Ah, Boothy, Booth Booth. How to be kind about this.
You know I have the highest regard for you. Yes. And? And I think you're a very intelligent witty guy. Your sense of humor is near the top of the heap. So? But I just didn't really enjoy Mon Oncle very much. Yes, the dogs were cute and I wouldn't have minded more of them. Their dialogue was almost as interesting as that between the humans. Which is one of my main problems with Mon Oncle. I'm the kinda gal who likes a good script with a touch of schadenfreude and dolorifuge and stuff. I'm big on story. Sigh. Okay... Really, my husband was not keen on watching it at all when I said it was a 1950s French comedy. But he went along for the ride even though I had a fresh, newly-bought copy of Volver sitting on the coffee table alongside the Netflix envelope. I said, "Come on! Give it a chance. Look here... it won a Best Foreign Film Oscar in 1958." We had several opportunities for conversation as the film creeped along ever so slowly. Cute house. I like when people hang their clothing on an outdoor clothesline. Watch that upper story window. I'll bet Tati is going to walk past it. Oh, look, he hides his key over the door. What's he trying to do with that window? Looks like he wants to direct the reflection from the glass onto the bird cage to make that canary chirp. Yup. Bet his snooty sister turns off the fish fountain when she see it's just her brother at the gate. How much do you wanna bet they get trapped in the garage with that new automatic door! Well, in the long moments we spent trying to maintain interest, I was thinking about a day when this would have been an enjoyable film for a theater full of people. French people? Didn't matter too much since it was almost a silent film. I might have thought it was in the US what with all the cool American cars. Liked that green, pink and lavendar Chevy! Coolness!! It made me think of the times I've watched European television shows and marveled at the fact that they had an audience. I also found my mind wondering about just what circumstances led you to appreciate this movie, Booth. I thought maybe it was some French girl who had wanted to turn you on to aspects of la cinema Francaise beyond Jules et Jim. Maybe it was featured in a class you took in architecture school on mid-century European houses. What can I say. Maybe it's just the era or the region or something missing from my DNA, but I couldn't find enough to wrap my arms around. At one point I checked the time counter and saw we had watched exactly half of the film. I thought that was a fair. If nothing caught our interest in that much time, I didn't think there would be a sudden burst of exciting footage ahead. So I packed it back up in the red envelope and slipped Volver into the DVD player instead. Care to help me understand what I missed? I hope this wasn't too hurtful.
Susan
“Half a truth is often a great lie.” Ben Franklin
|
| 590. Sunday, September 27, 2009 7:43 AM |
| Booth |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 8/20/2006 Posts:4388
View Profile Send PM
|
Oh dear, that's unfortunate. I don't know how to describe why I like it so much, but I'll try.
Edit: And then came some embarrassing twaddle.
|
| 591. Monday, April 9, 2007 10:20 AM |
| Laura was a patient of mine |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 3/15/2006 Posts:690
View Profile Send PM
|
Whoops, sorry Nuart (I knew naming people was a bad idea)... I wonder who it was... I couldn't find the old thread. Just finished The Blue Angel. Great film... it's a 1930 German film starring Marlene Dietrich and directed by Josef von Sternberg. It's about an uptight college professor who hears that his students have been going to a cabaret-like nightclub called The Blue Angel to see the beautiful dancer Lola Lola. He pays a visit, trying to catch them in the act but he unexpectedly falls in love with Lola, and marries her, losing his reputation as well as his job. The first half is comedy, the second tragedy. Some plot gaps in the second half and a too abrupt ending, with an amazing (and bizarre) sequence towards the end that nearly matches some of Lynch's best scenes.
That god damn trailer's more popular than Uncle's Day in a whorehouse!
|
| 592. Monday, April 9, 2007 9:24 AM |
| nuart |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/18/2005 Posts:7632
View Profile Send PM
|
That's okay, LWaPoM. I have a feeling there were more than a few who loved that film. Lola Lola. NICE name! Booth, that's a good explanation. I think I know what you're describing. It's more than a spectator's experience for you.
Susan
“Half a truth is often a great lie.” Ben Franklin
|
| 593. Sunday, September 27, 2009 7:44 AM |
| Booth |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 8/20/2006 Posts:4388
View Profile Send PM
|
| QUOTE: It's more than a spectator's experience for you.
|
Yes, something like that.
|
| 594. Monday, April 9, 2007 8:19 PM |
| smokedchezpig |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/19/2005 Posts:5246
View Profile Send PM
|
The Age of Innocence - Finally got around to watching this again tonight...it had been so long since I had seen it and I knew it was a great film of Scorcese's but was blown away by it as if I had nver seen it before. Day-Lewis and Pfieffer's performances are exquisite pieces of art. I also forgot about the devices Scorcese used that gave it that Marty feel like the zoom-ins on characters reading the letters they sent aloud as if the person receiving the letter could hear them in their head, The use of the "encircling spotlight" and of the course the flashback at the end. Throw in Thelma's editing, Ballhaus' camera and a great Elmer Berstein score...a truly wonderful film that has a solid place in my Scorcese collection...
"Every day holds a new beginning and every hour holds the promise of an Invitation to Love."
|
| 595. Tuesday, April 10, 2007 5:29 AM |
| cybacaT |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 5/25/2006 Posts:1216
View Profile Send PM
|
I just watched STAY - the 2005 version with Ewan Macgregor. Although I was half-watching and half-working, I found myself drawn to the movie and ultimately enjoyed it. It's been billed as a movie that will appeal to David Lynch fans, and I can understand why. It's very arty, interpretive and deep in places...and needs a second watch! I won't write any spoilers here, but if any of you have seen this movie I'd love to hear your thoughts on it...
|
| 596. Tuesday, April 10, 2007 11:36 AM |
| Laura was a patient of mine |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 3/15/2006 Posts:690
View Profile Send PM
|
Hey I just saw that last week! I liked it a lot. I wasn't expecting that much but I like McGregor and (of course) Naomi Watts. The script was so so and the flashy camera at the beginning was annoying, but I was really drawn in, and after about 15 minutes the shooting style really starts to work for the movie. It was pretty trippy, and I liked the way time and space just melted together... that sounds pretentious but it was an effect reminiscent of DL's work, especially Inland Empire. The ultimate twist was a bit too much like Mulholland Drive, but the final scene was really beautiful. I think that Watts (though she didn't get much screen time) and Ryan Gosling were terrific. McGregor didn't have as much to do but he was a good, likeable actor to guide us through the weirdness (though his American accent was annoying). I also thought the direction was very good. A few really dumb scenes though, particularly those involving Henry's parents.
That god damn trailer's more popular than Uncle's Day in a whorehouse!
|
| 597. Thursday, April 12, 2007 6:25 AM |
| smokedchezpig |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/19/2005 Posts:5246
View Profile Send PM
|
I am finally going to get around to watching the director's cut of Kingdom of Heaven in the next few days...I want to hurt somebody...turns out the dipsh*t seller on E-bay f-ed up and the Children of Men DVD is gonna be fullscreen....I guess I'll keep it for now until I can get around to buying the proper copy...Meanwhile, I have recently purchased Paths of Glory by Stanley Kubrick, Delicatessen by Jeunet/Caro, Blood Diamond (which I will gladly loan to Susan) and Notes on a Scandal
"Every day holds a new beginning and every hour holds the promise of an Invitation to Love."
|
| 598. Friday, April 13, 2007 10:21 PM |
| 12rainbow |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/19/2005 Posts:4953
View Profile Send PM
|
Sleeping Dogs Lie, dir. by Bob Goldthwait Is it funny? Some good one liners, but not enough to make the whole film funny. Disturbing? Yup. It's about a girl who once gave a canine a BJ and struggle with the desire to be totally honest with her fiancee about it, then the mess that follows the disclosure. Moral? There are some things no one needs to know. Though apparently, having a secret like this makes makes you pretty forgiving about other people's transgressions. Okee dokee.
|
| 599. Saturday, April 14, 2007 6:29 AM |
| smokedchezpig |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/19/2005 Posts:5246
View Profile Send PM
|
Match Point - Wow! It was really good. My buddy Luis loaned me it and Flags of Our Fathers yesterday when we worked together and he suggested I watch Match Point first (apparently, he knows me well enough to know it was my kind of movie). Did not ecen expect the change of plot that occurs and Jonathan Rhys-Myers and Scarlett Johannsen, Emily Mortimer were all great and I loved the casting of Brian Cox as the patriarch. A great script, story and I loved all the bits with the detectives, they were hilarious...can't say anymore than that. Oh yeah, and the grainy sounding opera soundtrack added tremendously to the mood of the film as well.
"Every day holds a new beginning and every hour holds the promise of an Invitation to Love."
|
| 600. Saturday, April 14, 2007 7:37 AM |
| LogicHat |
RE: Last movie, a little more in-depth |
Member Since 12/19/2005 Posts:2335
View Profile Send PM
|
The Night Listener An okay thriller, but watching this after reading the book is pretty redundant. You know the plot twists, and there's not a whole lot of new material to be found. The book's author, Armistead Maupin, was one of three writers credited for the screenplay, so maybe that's the problem. The cinematography is rather similar to Robin Williams' other creepy thriller, One Hour Photo, but even it isn't that remarkable.
Logic Hat Online- logichat.org
|
|
New Topic |
Post Reply
|
Page 24 of 63 ::
<< |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 |
>>
|
|
Movies, TV, Music & Games
> Last movie, a little more in-depth
|
| Users viewing this Topic (1) |
| 1 Guest |
Powered by JorkelBB 2006 (Version 1.0b)
|
|
|